- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Bahrain Shiite bloc asks: Join or snub talks?
Much hangs in balance as rulers wait for decision from opposition
Question of the Day
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — Just days before Bahrain’s Sunni rulers hope to open talks with the Shiite opposition they crushed, the country’s most powerful pro-reform bloc is asking supporters a pivotal question: whether to join or snub the dialogue.
Already, the leaders of the Shiite political group Al Wefaq have appeared to show their leanings — questioning how reconciliation efforts, pushed by the U.S., can proceed while authorities still impose rigid security measures and hold trials linked to the Shiite-led campaign for greater rights.
Now the question of whether to participate in the government-arranged dialogue beginning Saturday is being debated in town-hall-style meetings around the strategic Gulf island nation, home to the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet.
Much hangs on the outcome.
The absence of Wefaq would be a severe blow to the credibility of the talks and reinforce the sense that Bahrain is still deeply wounded after more than four months of unrest.
Wefaq is the leading political voice for Shiites — about 70 percent of Bahrain’s 1.2 million people — and held 18 seats in the 40-member parliament before a mass resignation to protest the violence against demonstrators.
It also would sting Washington, which has publicly backed the talks as the only option to calm tensions in one of its main Gulf military allies. At the same time, the U.S. is under growing pressures to take a harder line against Bahrain’s ruling dynasty, which claims that the Shiite power Iran has a role in the protests.
At least 31 people have died since February, when Bahrain’s Shiites — inspired by uprisings elsewhere in the Middle East — started a campaign for greater freedoms and an end to the Sunni hold on power.
Hundreds of Shiite opposition supporters and leaders have been arrested or dismissed from state jobs and universities.
Last week, eight prominent opposition activists were sentenced to life in prison. On Monday, 28 doctors and nurses faced charges of taking part in the protests and spreading “false news” — which is seen as a reference to talking to foreign media.
On Tuesday, defense lawyers said the 28 doctors and nurses were released from custody, though charges against them were not dropped.
At least 20 health professionals, who treated injured protesters during the unrest, remain in prison.
“They picked a date, they sent out invitations, and they decided on the agenda,” Mr. Salman said. “We feel that even the result of this dialogue has already been determined. That is a bad sign.”
Muneera Fakhro, a Sunni politician who is leading the secular Al Waad party at the talks, said the entire effort would be futile without Wefaq.
“If they don’t come, then with whom will the government talk in the opposition?” she said.
Even the distribution of seats points to a possible Wefaq protest boycott. Just five of the 300 seats in the talks have been set aside for Wefaq, even though Wefaq represented about 60 percent of voters in parliament elections last year.
Many other seats have gone to government-allied civic groups, political societies and business representatives.
A 37-year-old engineer, who was fired from his job at a state-run company for protesting, suggested that Wefaq and any other opposition party would risk losing support if it participated in the dialogue.
“We don’t trust this government, as it never cared about its own people and always broke promises,” said the engineer, who spoke on condition his name be withheld for fear of reprisals.
“It’s not an easy decision,” Mr. Salman said. “We try to do our best, but we don’t hold the key to all solutions and there are a lot of bad sentiments in the community.”
The U.S. had urged King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa’s regime to meet some opposition demands. It also expressed concern about the severity of the sentences and the use of military-linked security courts against protesters.
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- DCCC raising money on suggestion Obama impeachment is imminent
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq