- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
FEULNER: Preventing bankruptcy is a moral act
Financial collapse would cause greatest harm to the most vulnerable
Question of the Day
Can the federal government's spending spree last forever? Of course not. Even when economic growth is strong (hardly the case now, of course) it's foolish to keep spending more than we take in. Congress is going to have to make some serious cuts. Otherwise, we'll face a day of serious financial reckoning - and sooner than we think.
But you know common sense like that opens you up to a charge from some on the left: You're heartless. You'll gut the social safety net and toss poor people and seniors onto the street. "They don't want to make Medicare sustainable," writes New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, "they want to destroy it under the guise of saving it."
According to this playbook, it's immoral to suggest restraining the growth of entitlement programs.
Or is it? A recent exchange of letters between Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, Wisconsin Republican, sheds a very different light on the matter.
His committee's proposed 2012 budget "is not just about numbers," Mr. Ryan wrote the Catholic prelate, "but about the character and common good of the American people." Indeed, he said, it takes into account the church's social teaching regarding the poor.
Who, after all, will suffer the most if government spending continues to soar unabated? "The weakest will be hit three times over," Mr. Ryan wrote, "by rising costs, by drastic cuts to programs they rely on, and by the collapse of individual support for charities that help the hungry, the home- less, the sick, refugees and others in need."
Look at what's happening in many European nations. They're weathering financial crises brought on by years of overspending. So they're being forced to make "drastic cuts in benefits to the retired, the sick, the poor and millions of public employees," Mr. Ryan noted.
What irony. If we take the left's proposed tack - cosmetic cuts, no real reform of entitlement programs - seniors and the poor will take a real hit down the road.
But the committee's budget, Mr. Ryan wrote, "better targets assistance to those in need, repairs the social safety net, and fulfills the mission of health and retirement security for all Americans."
Yes, some groups would see their welfare end - "entrenched corporations, the wealthiest Americans," according to Mr. Ryan. Without that kind of reform, our ballooning federal budget will never get out of the red.
In his reply, Archbishop Dolan didn't endorse or criticize the budget, of course, but he did thank Mr. Ryan for recognizing an often-overlooked truth: Budgets are also moral documents. The values that helped shape our founding continue to affect our policy decisions, even if we are not always conscious of their influence.
Which values? A moral budget requires "fiscal responsibility; sensitivity to the foundational role of the family; the primacy of the dignity of the human person and the protection of all human life," the archbishop wrote, along with "a concrete solicitude for the poor and the vulnerable."
It seems paradoxical, but the way to save programs that help seniors and those in poverty is not to just keep throwing more money at them. If they're to survive, serious reform is in order. We need to greatly reduce waste, fraud and abuse and ensure we're getting help to people who actually need it.
That's the fiscally responsible thing to do - and the moral thing.
Ed Feulner is president of the Heritage Foundation (heritage.org).
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title