- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
Ambassador nominee says Afghanistan not hopeless
Question of the Day
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Obama’s choice for U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan said Wednesday the United States must continue its investment in the country to prevent it from backsliding into a safe haven for terrorists.
Ambassadorial nominee Ryan Crocker repeatedly was challenged by skeptical lawmakers who questioned a costly war now in its 10th year and nation-building that a fresh congressional report found has had limited success despite nearly $19 billion over 10 years, more than the United States has spent in any other country, including Iraq.
At his confirmation hearing, Mr. Crocker told the SenateForeign Relations Committee that the goal is “good enough governance” in Kabul, “good enough to ensure that the country doesn’t degenerate into a safe haven for al Qaeda.”
Mr. Crocker — a career diplomat who has served in Beirut, Islamabad and Baghdad — said the killing of Osama bin Laden in neighboring Pakistan was an important step toward disrupting al Qaeda. But he said much work remains to be done to ensure al Qaeda never threatens the United States from Afghanistan again.
Mr. Crocker said progress in Afghanistan has been significant but is still fragile and reversible. The U.S. is expected to begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan next month. The Obama administration hasn’t yet said how many of the 100,000 troops will leave initially.
Reflecting the congressional wariness and war fatigue, Sen. John F. Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, who is Foreign Relations Committee chairman, told Mr. Crocker, “Our current commitment, in troops and dollars, is neither proportional to our interests nor sustainable, in my judgment.”
Mr. Kerry and the panel’s other Democrats released a report late Tuesday that found that despite $18.8 billion spent by the United States to help stabilize and build up Afghanistan, that nation is at risk of falling into financial crisis when foreign troops leave in 2014.
Misspent foreign aid can result in corruption, alter markets and undercut the ability of the Kabul government to control its resources, said the report, which was posted Tuesday night on the Senate committee’s website. The World Bank found that a whopping 97 percent of the gross domestic product in Afghanistan is linked to spending by the international military and donor community.
“Afghanistan could suffer a severe economic depression when foreign troops leave in 2014 unless the proper planning begins now,” the report said.
Mr. Obama, after conferring with military leaders and senior advisers, will decide this month on how many of the 100,000 troops to withdraw from Afghanistan. The drawdown is expected to begin in July.
The State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development are spending about $320 million a month on foreign aid there, relying on the money to “win hearts and minds.” Among the successes has been a sevenfold increase in the number of children attending school and gains in health care.
But the report said the United States must take a closer look at how it spends the money, relying heavily on contractors. The U.S. must do a better job of oversight, especially as it funds more aid through the Afghan government. One recommendation was to standardize Afghan salaries and work with the government on staff limitations.
The panel’s Democrats also suggested that Congress implement multiyear aid programs and closer scrutiny of stabilization programs.
“Transition planning should find the right balance between avoiding a sudden drop-off in aid, which could trigger a major economic recession, and a long-term phase-out from current levels of donor spending,” the report said.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness from the carpool lane.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow