- Mexican train carrying 1,300 migrants headed toward U.S. derails
- Secret Service begins regular K-9 patrols around White House
- Pentagon’s human memory-chip program moves forward
- Obama blasts GOP, ignores immigration crisis in Texas speech
- Marine Warfighting Lab tests the Godzilla of amphibious assault vehicles
- Harry Reid: Birth-control ruling the worst Supreme Court decision in 25 years
- Vet suicides ‘horrible human cost’ of VA dysfunction: lawmaker
- First marijuana customer in Spokane says he was fired
- Hagel: ‘Make no mistake,’ ISIL is an ‘imminent’ threat to U.S.
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to ‘fight for national sovereignty’
MURDOCK: Replacing ‘MediCrash’ with ‘MediChoice’
Better marketing could sell Americans on Ryan plan to save Medicare
Question of the Day
"Premium support" is at the heart of GOP efforts to modernize Medicare before it evaporates, as soon as 2020. Democrats have mutilated this excellent idea, which also bears a dreadful name. House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan, Wisconsin Republican, and his colleagues should relaunch this concept, pronto.
Republicans should remind mewling Democrats that economists in liberal thinks tanks created the idea of premium support. The Brookings Institution's Henry J. Aaron and the Urban Institute's Robert Reischauer fathered it in 1995.
Former Sen. John Breaux, Louisiana Democrat, promoted this reform as co-chairman of President Clinton's bipartisan Medicare overhaul commission.
"I have proposed a premium support Medicare plan modeled after the health care plan serving nearly 10 million federal workers, retirees and their families," Mr. Breaux wrote in March 1999. "Premium support means the government would literally support or pay part of the premium for a defined core package of Medicare benefits," he explained. "Today, Congress micromanages Medicare and the government uses fee schedules and thousands of pages of regulations to set prices for specific services," he continued. "My plan combines the best that the private sector has to offer with the government protections we need to maintain the social safety net."
Former Sen. Bob Kerrey, Nebraska Democrat, echoed Mr. Breaux. As he told Reuters news agency in May, 1999: "You're much better off letting 50 million people make decisions on their own than having [Washington] decide things from the top down."
Mr. Breaux still favors this approach.
"We have to end Medicare as we know it," Mr. Breaux said in the May 25 edition of the Baton Rouge Advocate. "We don't have to deliver it the same way we did in 1965."
Unfortunately for this fine policy that Democrats conceived, "premium support" sounds like either an overpriced bridge abutment or a mink jock strap. Only an actuary could love such a cold, sterile phrase. Even worse, nobody outside Washington fathoms this verbiage.
Jim Guirard, longtime chief of staff to the late Sen. Russell Long, Louisiana Democrat, runs the TrueSpeak Institute. He advises the GOP to market "MediChoice." Unlike the head scratching that "premium support" inspires, MediChoice signals that Republicans would give seniors choice in medical coverage. Just as the GI Bill helps veterans pay tuition at schools that match their interests, MediChoice would help future Medicare recipients (now 54 or younger) buy coverage that suits their circumstances.
Mr. Guirard urges Republicans to call today's Medicare system "MediCrash." The Democrats' policy - snatching $520 billion from Medicare for Obamacare and pretending that it's the Platonic form of fiscal health - invites financial catastrophe. By Sept. 30, 2020, the Congressional Budget Office forecasts, Medicare's trust fund will be "exhausted." Republicans should reiterate that Democrats - not the greedy, granny-killing GOP - perpetrated a half-trillion-dollar heist against Medicare's coffers to underwrite Obamacare. Democrats pitifully refuse to do anything to prevent this calamity. What will their negligence yield in just over nine years? CBO predicts: MediCrash.
Republicans also must defeat the Democrats' repulsive imagery of the GOP literally throwing grandma to her death. Instead, Mr. Ryan and company should show Americans what to expect under MediChoice. Rather than run from the voucher concept, why not embrace it? Mr. Ryan would have the Treasury send money directly to whichever health insurer a senior selects. To help beneficiaries understand these transfer payments, why not send them physical MediChoice grant notices equal to their total subsidies? For added comfort, these grants should resemble today's Social Security checks.
MediChoice advocates should use mock-ups of such a voucher to remind Americans that Mr. Ryan and the GOP want to give future seniors something concrete and worthy, not fling them fatally from cliffs.
One high-level GOP congressional aide tells me that Republicans fear that if they unveil a physical voucher, "Democrats will attack it as some kind of discount coupon." Fine. Far better for Democrats to accuse Republicans of giving granny a coupon to buy health insurance that she likes, rather than murdering her and selling her wheelchair for caviar money.
Deroy Murdock is a columnist with Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with Stanford's Hoover Institution.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Most Americans get their kicks from their own game
Get Breaking Alerts
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- HUSAIN: The fake caliph of 'The Islamic State'
- IRS employee suspended for pro-Obama activities
- HUSAR: Mexicos Pena Nieto passes the immigration bucket
- GOP: Lerner warned IRS employees to hide information from Congress
- Va. Democrat reportedly seeks nude shots of Kendall Jones
- Tiger Woods' swing changes have hurt his game, Paul Azinger says
- ISTOOK: Flying illegals home would be 99.5 percent cheaper than Obamas plan
- Amid border crisis, Obama to take 15-day vacation in Martha's Vineyard
- GOP aims to sue Obama first over health care employer mandate
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama has no intention of repatriating illegals
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: America: Land of the free no more?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Wage-theft by employers needs legislative remedy
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Douglass would abhor affirmative action
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's voter bloc of 'entitlement' illegals