- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
HUNTER: Senate Democrats hold seniors hostage
Lawmakers jeopardize retirement checks to force up debt ceiling
Senate Democrats put pork ahead of Social Security last week when they lined up unanimously to kill legislation that would have guaranteed that seniors would receive Social Security payments in full and on time in the event the debt ceiling is not raised and the government is precluded from borrowing more money. In a 52-47 party-line vote, Democrats tabled an amendment (S.A. 113) to the Patent Reform Act(S. 23) that would have required the government to “prioritize all obligations on the debt held by the public in the event that the debt limit is reached, providing also that the government give equal priority to payment of Social Security benefits.”
In other words, under the amendment, Social Security and interest on the national debt would have been given first call on current revenues, which are more than three times the amount required to pay interest and Social Security combined, to ensure that there would be plenty of money available to pay debt service and Social Security benefits if the government were unable to borrow more money. The amendment, introduced by Sen. Jim DeMint, South Carolina Republican, on behalf of Sen. David Vitter, Louisiana Republican, was a revised version of the Full Faith and Credit Act (S. 163) introduced earlier by Sen. Pat Toomey, Pennsylvania Republican.
The Toomey bill requires only that debt service be prioritized to have first call on current federal revenues to pay interest on the debt held by the public in the event the debt ceiling is reached. The Alliance for Retirement Prosperity was alone among the so-called senior groups, including AARP, in urging the expansion of the prioritization under the Full Faith and Credit Act to include Social Security. Mr. Toomey agreed with the Alliance that Social Security should receive equal protection, and he was an enthusiastic supporter of the Vitter-DeMint amendment to the patent act, which expanded his language to include Social Security.
For decades, Democrats have played the demagogue on seniors’ issues, constantly accusing Republicans of wanting to dismantle Social Security and put seniors out in the cold. But it was Democrats who slashed Medicare without reforming it to help pay for Obamacare, and now, when it comes time to do something real to protect Social Security, it is the Republicans, not Democrats, who put their votes where their mouths are.
The vote on the Toomey-Vitter-DeMint amendment finally showed just how duplicitous Democrats have been on Social Security. While constantly bloviating on the need to protect Social Security from those dastardly Republicans, what Democrats really have been up to all this time is protecting their ability to use Social Security as leverage to hold seniors hostage and feed the liberal addiction to higher federal spending and more federal debt. The last thing in the world Senate Democrats want is actually to protect Social Security from the threat of default if the government shuts down or the debt ceiling is frozen and the government is not allowed to borrow more money. That would eliminate their ability to hold seniors hostage whenever Congress thinks about cutting spending and reining in the national debt.
The defeat of the Toomey-Vitter-DeMint amendment to the patent act is only the beginning. It should be a wake-up call to the American people to get behind this effort. Congress will have adequate opportunity between now and the time it runs up against the $14.29 trillion debt ceiling, which the Treasury Department estimates will occur between April 15 and May 31, to reconsider the Toomey-Vitter-DeMint amendment.
As Jack Kemp used to emphasize, great changes occur when Archimedean leverage is applied on the margin, where small changes can produce huge consequences. Mr. Toomey, Mr. Vitter and Mr. DeMint are the men on the margin, and if they play their cards right, it won’t take much to pry enough Democrats loose to release the senior hostages and free Congress to get about the business of reducing the size of government.
Lawrence A. Hunter is president of the Alliance for Retirement Prosperity.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- EDITORIAL: Connecticut revolts against gun controls that could criminalize 300,000
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Two liberals say Sarah Palin is right: Obama lacks substance
- Malaysia Airlines says plane on route to Beijing missing
- Soldier who hid to avoid saluting the flag to be punished in secret; Army won't release details
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults