- The Washington Times - Tuesday, May 31, 2011

The third year of Barack Obama’s presidency is running into the same troubles he faced in his first two, thus undermining his prospects for a second term.

No issue looms larger than the economy’s continued weakness, despite $1 trillion in stimulus money Mr. Obama and his party threw into a black hole of government spending with little to show for it except unprecedented government debt.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the Republican front-runner for the GOP nomination who built his reputation in business before entering politics, says he’ll focus his campaign on the anemic economy and how to get it moving again.

Smart strategy. The Obama economy - that’s what we can call it now - will be far and away the issue that will determine the outcome of the 2012 election, and it isn’t anything to brag about.

The unemployment rate remains high at 9 percent, but that’s the average and doesn’t reflect the dismal job situation in many parts of the country. Rates in major, highly populated states remain in double-digits and many others have not seen their numbers significantly change in months.

“Seven states recorded measurably higher rates, and 19 states and the District of Columbia had rates that were not appreciably different from the national rate,” the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics reported last week.

States with unemployment rates at between 9 percent and 9.9 percent include Missouri, Connecticut, Washington, Alabama, Arizona, New Jersey, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, plus the District.

States suffering double-digit unemployment include Kentucky, 10 percent; Michigan, 10.2 percent; Mississippi, 10.4 percent; Florida, 10.8 percent; Rhode Island, 10.9 percent; California, 11.9 percent, and Nevada, 12.5 percent.

Many Americans think the jobless numbers are much higher than the government’s monthly numbers, and Gallup Poll tracking surveys suggest that may be the case. Gallup puts unemployment at 9.2 percent and “underemployment” (when you include workers who are discouraged and no longer looking for work, or those who could find only part-time jobs) at 19.2 percent.

If Democrats across the country are looking for some outrage from their party’s leaders about all of this, they won’t hear it coming from the Democrats in Congress, who rarely complain about the high jobless rate for fear of being seen as criticizing Mr. Obama’s economic policy - even though he no longer has one.

That represents quite a turnaround for the Democrats, who were pounding President George W. Bush on the economy in 2007 - just before the recession hit - when the unemployment rate was 4.7 percent.

Mr. Obama and his party bet the barn that their costly public-works spending plan would create tens of millions of jobs and boost the nation’s economic growth rate.

But two years and five months later, the once-robust American economy is crawling along at a snail’s pace - 1.8 percent growth rate, according to the U.S. Commerce Department’s latest report on the country’s gross domestic product.

As the economy slows, so does job creation. “Analysts expect the May jobs report to show 195,000 net new positions created, a step down from the 244,000 added in April,” Washington Post economics reporter Neil Irwin wrote this week.

As much as the White House ballyhoos job numbers that have crept into the 200,000 range, it’s going to take monthly job numbers in the 300,000 range (which we saw in the 1980s growth spurt) to keep pace with population growth and bring jobless rates down to normal levels by 2013 at the earliest.

Story Continues →