EDITORIAL: Bin Laden dies, Islamism thrives

Ex-Homeland Security chief warns of complacency in terror fight

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

The death of Osama bin Laden is an epochal moment in counterterrorism. In the greater struggle of the civilized world against the jihadist movement, however, it is just one of many milestones along the road.

Bin Laden’s death satisfied the American sense of justice. The perpetrator of the most devastating terror attack on U.S. soil could not rightly escape ultimate punishment for his deadly crimes. Eliminating bin Laden also bolstered American credibility. “It was important to make good on President Bush’s promise to bring him in dead or alive,” former Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge told The Washington Times. “The United States has achieved that.” Promise made, promise kept.

We asked Mr. Ridge what the impact of bin Laden’s death would be on the greater Islamist movement, and he said “Not much.” The struggle against jihadist extremism is “the defining challenge of this generation,” and in the context of the global Islamist movement, bin Laden was just one man. He was vitally important in promoting and extending the movement, but he represented neither its beginning nor its end. “We killed the man but not the ideology,” Mr. Ridge said.

Islamism is a threat because its tenets are irreconcilable with western liberalism. The self-evident truths that underlie American democracy are not only foreign to Islamist thought, they are inimical to it. Individual liberty, freedom of thought and faith, respect for women, democratic government and capitalism are fundamental to contemporary western life but abhorrent to the Islamist creed. This is the battleground on which the current war of ideas is being fought. Islamism and the American way of life cannot peaceably coexist.

Over the years the challenge to western civilization posed by Islamism has metastasized. “The threat is now more diverse and more complex,” Mr. Ridge said. It goes well beyond al Qaeda to include movements like the Taliban; Pakistan’s Lashkar-e Taiba, which perpetrated the November 2008 Mumbai massacre; Lebanese Hezbollah; the Muslim Brotherhood; and the Brotherhood’s harder-line cousins, Hizb ut-Tahrir al-Islami (The Party of Islamic Liberation). The Islamist challenge also includes state actors, in particular Iran, which since 1979 has actively promoted the extremist views of the father of the Iranian revolution, the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The United States has fought many battles with al Qaeda, but these are the members of the jihadist coalition that define the scope of the war.

Mr. Ridge spoke Thursday at the launch of a new initiative, the World Almanac of Islamism, developed by the American Foreign Policy Council in Washington. The Almanac is “a comprehensive resource designed to track the rise or decline of radical Islam on a national, regional and global level.” It is an online source for information intended to give policymakers, scholars and anyone interested in the topic a one-stop location for objective, nonpartisan information about the growing Islamist movement.

With bin Laden dead, the U.S. pulling out of Iraq and gearing up for withdrawal from Afghanistan, there is a risk that policymakers and the public will tune the Islamist challenge out. This would be a mistake. Declining American influence in the Mideast, coupled with the recent wave of uprisings in the region, preset unprecedented opportunities for Islamist movements to promote their ideology and seek to take control of more countries. If this happens, the future challenges for the United States will be even greater than those posed by al Qaeda at the peak of bin Laden’s power and influence. Taking down Osama bin Laden “was a successful singular operation,” Mr. Ridge said, “but there is still a lot of work to do.”

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts