- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- ISTOOK: IRS “wants to throw us in jail,” says tea party leader
- Easter woes: Chocolate costs soar, becoming ‘unaffordable’ luxury
- Michaels craft chain confirms hackers hit 3M customers
- Special Forces’ suicide rates hit record levels — casualties of ‘hard combat’
- Many Americans would quickly face financial hardship after losing job, poll shows
- Toronto Mayor Rob Ford thanks supporters at re-election campaign bash
FCC chief, GOP spar on ‘net neutrality’
Web-traffic rules called a federal power grab
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski on Wednesday offered a strong defense of his agency’s new Internet traffic regulations, telling skeptical Republican lawmakers that existing laws were not strong enough to police the large firms that operate the Web’s infrastructure..
“In my view, while critically important, antitrust laws alone would not adequately preserve the freedom and openness of the Internet,” the FCC chief told a House Judiciary subcommittee on the hot-button issue of “net neutrality.”
The issue has led to sharp disputes between major users of the Web and telecommunications giants — such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon — that build and maintain the basic wiring underlying the global information network.
Led by Rep. Robert W. Goodlatte, Virginia Republican, GOP lawmakers at the hearing questioned whether the new rules pushed through by Mr. Genachowski usurp congressional authority and federal antitrust laws.
“I believe a light-touch, antitrust-based approach will best protect a competitive, innovative and open Internet,” he said Thursday.
“You sell [spectrum], and then you want to tell them how to use it,” the California Republican said.
On a largely party-line vote last month, the House voted 240-179 to repeal the FCC regulations, but the agency has the support of the Democrat-controlled Senate and of President Obama, who appointed Mr. Genachowski.
Mr. Genachowski said the new regulations, approved in December, are necessary.
Antitrust enforcement, he argued, “is expensive to pursue, takes a long time, and kicks in only after damage is done.”
Robert M. McDowell, one of the two Republicans on the commission who voted against the FCC’s so-called “Open Rules of the Road” for the Internet, warned that the regulations threated to stifle innovation in the tech sector of the American economy.
The net-neutrality rules will “disproportionately affect smaller companies who will have to bear the adjudication costs,” he said. “Nothing is broken that needs fixing.”
Net neutrality, which President Obama campaigned on before the 2008 elections, is designed to prevent the telecommunications giants from using their gatekeeper status to impede the business of their competitors, from Web powers such as Google down to small startup Internet businesses.
But Republicans have called the new regulations a federal power grab and a “solution in search of a problem.”
Many in the industry have supported the rules, which proponents have cast as a compromise that protects the access of entrepreneurs and content providers, like Netflix, while providing the flexibility telecoms need to manage traffic on their networks.
But the rules are being challenged by Verizon, which has said it will fight net neutrality in court.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Eldridge joined The Washington Times in 1999 and over the next seven years helped lead the paper’s coverage of regional politics and government, Sept. 11, and the sniper attacks of 2002. In 2006, he was named managing editor of the paper’s website. He came to The Times from the Telegraph in North Platte, Neb., where he served as executive ...
- Silver: GOP has 60% chance to retake Senate
- Country Times: As all-timers go, Cash remains The Man (In Black)
- COUNTRY TIMES: Is Taylor's relationship with Nashville coming to a Swift end?
- COUNTRY TIMES: Nashville's collaboration with Doobie Brothers a natural partnership
- COUNTRY TIMES: Dierks Bentley is here to save country music
Latest Blog Entries
- Mainers would rather move to Canada than down South
- McCain: 'Stand your ground' laws may need review
- Sen. Tom Coburn: Holder investigating himself is a 'total conflict of interest'
- CNN poll: IRS, AP and Benghazi haven't dinged Obama's approval rating
- Slain diplomat's mom on Obama's Benghazi comments: 'Bullfeathers'
TWT Video Picks
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- Immigration still on hold: Boehner's office
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- PRUDEN: When a bored president just 'mails it in'
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- BRUCE: Obama deliberately emboldening America's enemies
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.