- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
SIMMONS: Tax-spend not dead in District
Pay attention fiscal conservatives and members of the tea party: A new poll lends heft to the script written by tax-and-spenders, including D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray.
Speak now or forever hold your opposition.
“D.C. voters strongly prefer maintaining public services over holding down taxes as a budget priority today,” according to a survey conducted by Hart Research Associates. “Large majorities find cuts to police and public safety, education and specific social services to be unacceptable.”
Granted, the telephone poll reflects the views of only 504 likely D.C. voters, but its findings provide a solid foundation for the left to raise taxes so more money can be spent on public services — i.e. welfare, subsidized housing and public schools.
Oh, sure, respondents balked at cutting public safety, with 70 percent saying such a move would be “unacceptable.” But even that’s a blessing in disguise since the mayor’s 2012 budget proposal gives short shrift to the Metropolitan Police Department.
The Gray plan would cut police staffing from 3,870 to about 3,700 officers — a problem Congress must correct.
The police department’s key issues are recruitment and attrition, which began during the administration of Mayor Adrian M. Fenty, and police Chief Cathy L. Lanier needs new recruits in the pipeline ASAP.
But there’s another problem.
While poll respondents support tax increases, they oppose utilizing economic development to bring in new revenue.
The anti-Wal-Mart and smart-growth activists don’t mind supporting bike lanes, dog parks and specialty shops, which poor folks don’t or can’t afford to patronize, but all the while liberals also want to pay for abortions, enable drug addicts with needle exchanges and legalize marijuana.
The new poll, conducted April 20 to 22 on behalf of the spread-the-wealth D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute, also said this, according to a summary it released Sunday:
“A large majority of D.C. voters support the proposal to create an 8.9 percent income tax bracket for individuals above $200,000 — 85 percent for, to 14 percent against. Seventy percent support a proposed increase in the parking garage tax, with 25 percent against. Voters also expressed support for an effort to tax multistate corporations, 87 percent to 8 percent. Support for tax increases, particularly the income tax increase, is strong across the city and even among those who would have to pay the income tax. Among voters with incomes of more than $100,000, 90 percent say that they find the tax increase on individuals earning more than $200,000 to be acceptable.”
The liberals surely are salivating for the new revenue those higher taxes will dump into city coffers since there are no fiscal conservatives on the D.C. Council.
Indeed, the closest thing the District of Columbia has to budget hawks are Jack Evans, Ward 2 Democrat who is chairman of the Finance and Revenue Committee, and another Democrat, Vincent B. Orange, who won the April 26 special election for an open at-large seat.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...
- SIMMONS: Pictures of Obama and 'Dane' lady don't lie
- SIMMONS: Mandela: May the man of many roles rest in peace
- SIMMONS: Obama visits Southeast D.C. with minimum wage on his mind
- SIMMONS: Mayor Gray has only himself to outrun in campaign
- SIMMONS: Jack Kent Cooke's legacy continues to produce winners
Latest Blog Entries
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House pushes through two-year Ryan-Murray budget deal
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow