- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
Debate over visors rages in NHL
Question of the Day
Chris Pronger is a physically imposing human being, but what happened last week reduced him to a man screaming and writhing in pain. The tough Flyers defenseman had taken an inadvertent stick to the right eye and was bleeding as he rushed off the ice and to the locker room.
Following the game, Philadelphia general manager Paul Holmgren made it clear that, if it was up to him and team doctors, Pronger would not be cleared to play again unless he wore a protective visor. The injury, which could sideline the future Hall of Famer for weeks, has reignited an issue in the NHL about the use of visors and whether they should be mandatory.
On Thursday night in Edmonton, center Brooks Laich - one of seven Capitals to play without a visor - took a puck to the face that cut his ear and required stitches.
“I almost wish I wore a visor, just because incidents that can happen,” Laich said. “[Thursday] night you take a puck in the ear. Maybe that’s two inches and it’s in your eye.”
What used to be sharp debate about visors and the stigma attached to wearing them has softened over the years. And while the NHL is the only professional league in North America to not mandate the use of them, 68 percent of players now wear visors - up from 30 percent just 10 years ago.
“I used to see it when I played in the ‘80s and the start of the ‘90s, when you wore a visor it was like, ‘Well, you’re not tough,’ ” former Capital and current color analyst Craig Laughlin said. “That was the big thing in the ‘80s: ‘Well, he’s not that tough; he’s wearing a visor.’ “
Not anymore - but that doesn’t mean players are willing to concede that visors should be mandatory. Laich, who is the Capitals’ NHL Players’ Association representative, wore one at the junior level and during his first year in the NHL but has “never really thought about going back to it.”
It would take a scary moment and bad turn of events to push Laich to that point.
“I don’t want to say it would take a serious eye injury, but, you know, sometimes you don’t learn until something happens to you,” he said. “It’s like a seat belt - that sort of thing. I like the freedom of not having any obstruction around my eyes.”
“I realized the common sense answer is to put one on. We as a league have to get away from that machismo attitude of all the things that go along with a player that wears a visor,” said Malhotra, who added that he tried unsuccessfully to wear one several times in years past. “Learning what I did last year, realizing how delicate the eye is, you only get one shot with your eyes. You can get a new knee, you can get a new hip, but with the eyes, it’s such a delicate and precious thing.”
Pronger saw teammate Ian Laperriere go through much of what Malhotra dealt with, though with a concussion added in, when he took a slap shot to the face in the 2010 playoffs. Laperriere put on a visor because as much as he enjoyed not wearing one, he enjoyed a normal life with his family more. The Flyers forward has been forced out of the game because of the injuries he suffered from that incident.
But even while reporting blurry vision five days after the stick to the eye, Pronger would not commit to wearing a visor. And though Malhotra views it as a common sense issue, he’s against the idea of forcing players to wear one.
“I always think it’ll be a player’s choice as to what he wants to wear for protection,” Malhotra said. “We’re grown men; we can make that decision ourselves.”
That’s how the NHLPA has approached the issue, despite outside criticism. Internally, the association strongly encourages its players to wear visors. But there are no immediate plans to push for 100 percent visor usage because a majority of union members believe it should be a choice.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- WHYNO: Tomas Vokoun gets unexpected Stanley Cup shot with Penguins
- Brandon Meriweather, Redskins' secondary ready for bounceback year
- Kirk Cousins embraces role as Redskins' offseason starter as RG3 rehabs from injury
- Capitals notes: Realignment won't prompt roster remake
- Despite Caps' first-round playoff exit, Adam Oates' first season as coach left a positive taste
Latest Blog Entries
- Redskins injury updates (5/23): WR Pierre Garcon, CB Josh Wilson each had labrum surgery
- Capitals 'love' Matt Hendricks, but how much?
- Wojtek Wolski signs in Russia's Kontinental Hockey League
- Tom Poti won't return to Capitals, plans to continue his NHL career
- Is Tom Wilson ready to be a regular for Capitals?
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Pentagon wants extra $19M to equip, train Ukrainian troops
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- Houston mayor: Sorry that police put man's blind dog on road to die
- HUSAIN: Worlds grand ayatollahs rally behind Sistani
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors