- Dutch receiving Malaysia plane bodies irked at Putin’s daughter in Holland
- Algerian airplane goes missing over Mali: ‘Emergency plan’ launched
- Colorado judge strikes voter-backed gay marriage ban, but issues stay
- Brooklyn Bridge flag-swapping suspects identified by nickname
- Christian woman in Sudan spared for apostasy flies to Italy
- Iraq: 60 dead in attack on prisoner convoy
- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
New fuel standards unveiled
Greens, Democrats praise efficiency measures
Question of the Day
As part of a push to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil, the Obama administration Wednesday unveiled new fuel efficiency standards for cars, SUVs and pickups that will nearly double the required vehicle miles per gallon by 2025.
The proposal follows President Obama's agreement with 13 major automakers, announced in July, to increase fuel efficiency to the equivalent of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025 — up from the current standard of 28.3 miles per gallon. It applies to 2017-2025 cars and light truck models.
The White House said the proposal would slash 6 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions while saving drivers $1.7 trillion in fuel costs and reducing oil consumption by 2.2 million barrels a day, roughly a quarter of the current level of foreign imports. Administration officials also claim the new regulations would save consumers an average of $8,000 over the life of each vehicle.
The new rules were long-anticipated after Congress passed a law in 2007 requiring the Transportation Department to set fuel economy standards for cars and trucks at the highest or "maximum feasible" level each year between 2011 and 2030.
The administration will likely finalize the new standards by July after a public comment and review period that will include several public hearings around the country. California plans to issue its proposal for new standards for model years 2017 to 2025 on Dec. 7 with the goal of finalizing them by January.
Environmentalists welcomed the news, as did a number of lawmakers on Capitol Hill. In a Tuesday letter anticipating the White House announcement, a largely Democratic group of 109 members, including Rep. John D. Dingell, the dean of the delegation who represents Detroit, commended the president.
"[The proposal] will increase our national and economic security in an unprecedented way by dramatically decreasing our dependence on foreign sources of petroleum," they wrote.
But many Republicans are equally ardent in their opposition. More than 60 House Republicans last month vowed to stop the new standards and prevent them from being finalized. They argue that new regulations would kill jobs and increase vehicle prices.
Rep. Darrell E. Issa, a Republican from California who chairs the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, argued that raising fuel efficiency standards would actually increase vehicle costs for consumers by $3,000 and cost the country $157 billion to implement.
"Beyond jobs that would be lost as a result of this rule, there are concerns that these new regulations were crafted in a manner inconsistent with laws and basic standards of transparency that had the effect of hiding special interest agendas," he said.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency estimated that the new rule would add an average of $2,000 to the price of each new passenger vehicle sold by 2025 and cost the federal government $157 billion to implement, according to a draft of the proposal posted on the NHTSA website.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers embraced the overall goal of increasing fuel efficiency, but also voiced reservations that the new standards were too aggressive and did not account for consumers who may decide not to purchase higher-priced cars.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Susan Crabtree is an award-winning investigative reporter with more than 15 years of reporting experience in Washington, D.C. Her reporting about bribery, corruption and conflict-of-interest issues on Capitol Hill has led to several FBI and ethics investigations, as well as consequences for members within their caucuses and at the ballot box. Susan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP senators want IG probe of Sebelius' 'Obamacare' fundraising
- Teaming up with Christie, Obama says Jersey shore 'back in business'
- No Moore: Obama flubs name of Oklahoma city devastated by tornado, calls it 'Monroe'
- Obama to Okla. tornado victims: 'We have got your back'
- Aide involved in Benghazi talking points scrubbing promoted by Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Algerian airplane goes missing over Mali: 'Emergency plan' launched
- Despite rhetoric, gun prosecutions plummet under Obama
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- CROWLEY: The good-time president
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Hezbollah in Syria could join fight against Israel
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Poor Hillary, rock-star wannabe
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq