- Tea party-type lawmakers take mysterious, off-books trip to Mideast
- North Korea warns South: We’ll attack ‘without warning’
- Congress sends sweeping defense bill to Obama
- Multiple injuries as balcony collapses at London’s Apollo theatre during performance
- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
EDITORIAL: Occupy movement evicted
Mayors take action against vagrant protesters
Question of the Day
The party is ending for occupy encampments across the country. The crackdowns in New York’s Zuccotti Park and other locations signal that civic leaders have decided the headaches of managing the protests are greater than the costs of simply ending them.
The Occupy movement is falling victim to its internal contradictions. There always was something disjointed about ostensibly leaderless groups with vague demands seeking to set up permanent urban encampments. Immediate problems arose: sanitation, food, health issues, petty crime, drug use, sexual assault, fights and free riders. Reports of Occupy Wall Street (OWS) members objecting to people they called the “professional homeless” showing up to take advantage of the gourmet food donated by sympathetic area restaurants lent a hypocritical tinge to the enterprise claiming to represent the disenfranchised. “Whose brioche? Our brioche!”
The occupier groups have no clear objectives and no endgame, and as such represented a continuous and growing problem for city governments. The encampments disrupted businesses, tourism and the daily lives of those who lived nearby. There is something inherently selfish about occupiers squatting in neighborhoods, being a general nuisance and forcing taxpayers to foot the bill for millions of dollars in extra municipal services. However, seeking to take over prime real estate in lower Manhattan free of rent and property taxes definitely fits in with OWS’ “something for nothing” ethos.
The legal question over whether tent-city protests on public property constitute protected speech was answered decades ago. In the 1984 case Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence, the Supreme Court upheld a National Park Service crackdown on a “Reaganville” tent city erected in Washington’s Lafayette Park to protest Reagan administration homeless policies. “We seriously doubt that the First Amendment requires the Park Service to permit a demonstration in Lafayette Park and the Mall involving a 24-hour vigil and the erection of tents to accommodate 150 people,” moderate Justice Byron White wrote for the 7-2 majority. The Court ruled that banning camping was a reasonable regulation protecting the rights of others to enjoy the park while not preventing protesters from communicating their ideas in other ways.
An interesting political question is brewing over whether the crackdowns are coordinated. Oakland Mayor Jean Quan told the BBC she had participated in “a conference call with 18 cities across the country who had the same [occupier] situation,” organized by the United States Conference of Mayors. Portland, Ore., Mayor Sam Adams said calls were set up to enable mayors “to share information about the occupying encampments around the country” but were not operational in nature. Another report said the FBI and Department of Homeland Security were advising mayors on ways to dislodge the encampments.
In October, President Obama romantically linked the occupiers to the civil-rights movement of the 1960s, saying, “I understand the frustrations being expressed in those protests.” He also said, “people who are irresponsible, who are reckless, who don’t feel a sense of obligation to their communities” should not be rewarded. Perhaps he wasn’t talking about the bankers after all.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Ducking tolerance
- EDITORIAL: Red faces at the White House
- EDITORIAL: Doc Coburn's government diet
- EDITORIAL: A man for 2016
- EDITORIAL: Spies unlike us
Latest Blog Entries
By Michael P. Orsi
Edward Snowden should declare his patriotism in court
Get Breaking Alerts
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Huge backlash mounts over suspension of 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson
- PRUDEN: 'Tis the season for apologies
- EDITORIAL: Red faces at the White House
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- UHLER and FERRARA: Obamacare, the end of the progressive era
- Sebelius adds yet another exemption for Obamacare
- Breaking Bad: Alligators becoming the new pit bulls for drug dealers, cops say