A lawsuit filed over congressional redistricting in Virginia suggests likely partisan sniping in the state’s upcoming General Assembly session, with Democrats already contesting Republican claims to a Senate majority.
The lawsuit, filed last week in U.S. District Court for the Eastern Division of Virginia in Alexandria, calls for a three-judge panel to draw new lines for Virginia’s 11 congressional districts, as state House and Senate leaders remain deadlocked over the issue.
“What would have been preferable and favorable is for the General Assembly to accomplish that task,” said state Sen. A. Donald McEachin, Henrico Democrat and newly elected caucus chairman. “Regrettably, the House had to say, ‘Our way or the highway’ and force this matter into the courts.”
House Speaker William J. Howell disagrees.
“We tried to call the Democrats and have them come back prior to the [November] election, [but] they didn’t seem to want to do it,” said Mr. Howell, Stafford Republican, when he announced that the redistricting process would wait until next year.
The Republican-controlled House is pushing a plan that would largely keep intact the districts of the state’s 11 congressional incumbents, which critics are calling an “incumbent-protection plan” to help preserve the GOP’s 8-3 majority.
Additional wrangling is expected as a result of the November elections that willput 20 Democrats and 20 Republicans in the Virginia Senate — with Republican Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling holding the crucial, tiebreaking vote.
The Senate Democrats’ plan creates a second “minority-opportunity” district by decreasing the eligible black voting population to less than 50 percent in Democratic Rep. Robert C. “Bobby” Scott’s 3rd District.
The population in Rep. J. Randy Forbes‘ southeastern 4th District would in turn increase from about 33 percent to slightly more than 50 percent and become the state’s sole majority-minority district.
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include residents from congressional districts 1, 4, 7, 10, and 11, which have become “overpopulated” relative to others based on 2010 census figures. The lawsuit argues they will be deprived of their constitutional rights if the current lines stay in place.
J. Gerald Hebert, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, has worked for both state and national Democrats. But he says the suit is not affiliated with any of the congressional incumbents, Virginia senators or the state Democratic Party.
But the pre-emptive salvo isn’t entirely nonpartisan, said Quentin Kidd, a Christopher Newport University professor who helped spearhead a redistricting map-drawing competition for college students this year.
“In some ways, it’s kind of a lawsuit in my mind to contend the [notion] of the Republican-controlled General Assembly,” he said.
Regardless of who’s filing the suit, it’s designed to tip the scales toward the Democrats’ redistricting plan, he added, since in theory, the General Assembly could just pass the House plan once the regular session begins in January. Republicans control the House, and Mr. Bolling’s vote would give the GOP the edge in the Senate.
But exactly what a lieutenant governor can vote on, and when, is under intense scrutiny from both parties.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
By Elaine Donnelly
Extending sexual misconduct to combat units
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up.
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
Reviews, insights and commentary from an eclectic observer.
The world as veteran journalist Vance Garnett sees it, and saw it.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention