- Unemployment, job creation top biggest problems in America: poll
- Twitter crashes for second time in nine days
- Charles Manson associate Bruce Davis granted parole
- Israeli warplanes pound 29 Palestinian sites in Gaza: ‘Direct hits’ confirmed
- Eric Holder to give thumbs-up to drop jail time for drug offenders
- N.J. Gov. Chris Christie faces fire for Superstorm Sandy dollars: ‘Where’s the governor?’
- Pope Francis shakes Vatican Bank with ‘earthquake’ reforms
- White House: Obamacare didn’t matter in Florida special election
- Last laugh: Marine vet fires off jokes from the grave with own obituary
- Gas blast destroys 2 N.Y. buildings; 6 people dead
Failure of supercommittee gives old debt plans new life
Lawmakers take another look at Bowles-Simpson
With the failure of the deficit-reduction supercommittee, Congress turns its attention again to several previously disregarded bipartisan plans aimed at dealing with the federal budget mess.
Leading the way is a group of more than 140 House and Senate members who have pushed for a “go big” approach to debt reduction. Among their biggest inspirations is a $4 trillion proposal floated last year by a bipartisan panel headed by former Sen. Alan Simpson, Wyoming Republican, and Erskine Bowles, a chief of staff for President Clinton.
The 18-member White House-commissioned panel, which included current and former lawmakers from both houses of Congress, business and labor executives, and former high-ranking White House officials, identified more than $4 trillion in spending reductions by 2020 through tax reform, caps on discretionary spending, long-term entitlement reforms and health care savings.
“In the year that I have been in Washington, only the Bowles-Simpson proposal has generated bipartisan support in both houses of Congress,” wrote Sen. Joe Manchin III, West Virginia Democrat, in a letter Monday to President Obama to urge him to press for a congressional vote on the plan.
“While the Bowles-Simpson framework may not be perfect, it is the only proposal I have seen that provides pro-growth tax reform and long-term entitlement reform, while cutting our national debt.”
The plan would consolidate the tax code for individuals into three individual top rates: 12 percent, 22 percent and 28 percent. It would drop the top corporate tax rate to 26 percent from its current 35 percent.
The plan was widely praised by many outside groups as a logical and doable approach to reining in the debt, which this month topped $15 trillion. But many anti-tax Republicans bristled at the blueprint’s tax increases, even though the plan called for $3 of spending cuts for every $1 in new tax revenue.
Despite receiving support from 11 members of the commission in December, the plan was shelved after it failed to get the 14 votes needed to send it to Congress for consideration.
Yet as pessimism about the supercommittee grew in recent weeks, many on Capitol Hill have said the Bowles-Simpson plan is worth another look.
“There are some parts of [the plan] that I disagree with, but I think it’s better than doing nothing,” Sen. John McCain said Tuesday on Fox News. “And I think that we could make some significant changes” to the plan.
Some Bowles-Simpson supporters have accused Mr. Obama of failing to push the commission harder to accept the plan. But bits of the plan resurfaced in another $4 trillion deficit-reduction proposal floated this past summer by another bipartisan group, called “Gang of Six.”
The group of six senators - divided equally by party - suggested simplifying the tax code by reducing the number of tax expenditures and establishing three tax brackets with rates of 8 percent to 12 percent, 14 percent to 22 percent, and 23 percent to 29 percent.
The Senate plan also would curb the growth of Social Security benefits by moving to a lower inflation adjustment for annual cost-of-living updates. It also would reform - but not eliminate - tax expenditures for health, charitable giving, homeownership and retirement.
Another 2010 debt-reduction report by Alice Rivlin, an economist and former Clinton adviser, and former Sen. Pete Domenici, New Mexico Republican, went even further, calling for cuts that would lower the debt by almost $6 trillion by 2020.
Sixty percent of the plan would use spending cuts, and the rest would come from tax revenue. The plan also would lower the top corporate tax rate to 27 percent and establish top individual tax rates of 15 percent and 27 percent.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- John Boehner demands answers on NSA, phone records
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Emily Miller
Obama is losing the debate on gun ownership, concealed-carry permits
- Oil rig worker says he saw missing plane go down: report
- GOP bill tries to pull courts into fight with Obama on executive power, enforcing laws
- Ukrainian PM accuses Putin of wanting war
- Inside the Beltway: A new interest in Rahm Emanuel for 2016?
- MILLER: Law enforcement realizes good people with guns deter crime
- New Benghazi investigation published on the 18-month anniversary of the attack
- NRA shirt gets N.Y. high school student suspended
- Military families would take a $5,000 hit in benefits with Obama budget
- Special ops forces wearing thin from high demand
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
Chaos as Manhattan building explodes
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again