You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.

EDITORIAL: Occupied with violence

Peaceful Tea Party contrasts sharply with lefty rioters

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

Remember when Sarah Palin was accused of promoting "Tea Party violence" because she used an ad graphic depicting crosshairs on a map of the United States? On Wednesday, the Occupy Wall Street movement declared a general strike in Oakland, Calif. According to the Occupy Oakland website, the goal of their "anti-capitalist march" was to "shut down Oakland" and "blockade everything." This was no drawing - the violence was real.

Chanting hippies shut down commerce at the Port of Oakland, apparently unaware that this vital link to the outside world is what delivers the coffee beans for their Starbucks lattes and brings in the trendy iPhones they use to coordinate their activities. Riot police were dispatched to deal with those among "the 99 percent" who expressed themselves by smashing some windows, lighting fires, setting off explosives, spraying graffiti, assaulting police, throwing rocks and looting stores. Local developer Phil Tagami was forced to brandish a shotgun to dissuade occupiers from "reclaiming" his capitalist property, as the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

When you're a conservative, your movement receives the "violent" label with no justification. Tea Party protests never violated any laws or caused any damage. The polite participants were most notorious for their habit of cleaning up nicely after themselves. When it comes to the socialists befouling streets and parks in the Occupy Oakland protests, defenders insist the entire 99 percent can't be judged by the 100-plus arrested for committing actual crimes. Liberals insist this "fringe" element doesn't represent the 99 percent of the population they claim to represent.

As one protester, Michael Turner, explained in the Chronicle, "A few broken windows is a reflection of what I feel. I can understand why people would have the rage to go and break something. The general consensus is that this is peaceful, but there's no guarantee it will be peaceful." This is the kind of incoherent nonsense that flows from a movement whose goal is to expand welfare and destroy capitalism. It's all about taking things from others; violence is the natural result.

The Tea Party, on the other hand, is a movement rooted in a return to the nation's constitutional principles. Participants are motivated by love of country and patriotism, so there is no violence. The occupiers need to go home, take a shower and spend their energy trying to get a job.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts