- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Self-evident to all but ‘occupiers’
Question of the Day
News reports about the Occupy Wall Street "movement" and interviews with the occupiers are reminiscent of the doublespeak of the Mad Hatter, March Hare and Dormouse in "Alice in Wonderland."
To them, "greed" seems to characterize anyone with a lot of money, the rich are wealthy because they stole their cash, "social justice" requires the wealthy to share since they have more than they need, and "equality" and "fairness" mean redistribution to each according to his needs.
It is not unreasonable to conclude the misguided protesters subscribe to the collectivist ideal of "the greatest good for the greatest number," which implies the "good" of the majority must be achieved by the suffering of a minority. It is also not unreasonable to infer that to them, the benefit of one man depends on the sacrifice of another. They are oblivious to the self-evident truths that you cannot make the poor prosperous by legislating prosperity out of the wealthy - just as you can't multiply wealth by dividing it.
The inalienable rights of humankind, as defined and protected by the Constitution, are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The right to life means that people cannot be deprived of their lives or property for the benefit of another, nor for the benefit of any number of others.
The pursuit of happiness means our right to live for ourselves, to choose what constitutes our own happiness and to work for its achievement so long as we respect the same right in others. It means that the collective cannot decide what is to be the purpose of a man's existence, nor can it prescribe a person's choice of happiness. Henry David Thoreau warned, "If I knew for a certainty that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design of doing me good, I would run for my life."
If we do not understand, preserve and adhere to the principles that have nurtured the "greatest good" (i.e., the highest standard of living on the planet), we will live not as free people, but as serfs.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
Get Breaking Alerts
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- House GOP resurrects border bill, predicts successful Friday vote
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Islamic militants seize Benghazi as U.S. evacuates Libya