- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
- Obama ‘birther’ theories float, as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- U.S. drone faulted for killing 14 ‘innocent civilians’ at Yemen wedding
- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
Flexing my fantasy muscle? Not exactly
I had roughly 10 seconds to stop by the TV and get an update during the late afternoon games this past Sunday. In that time, I learned that Patriots running back BenJarvus Green-Ellis had run for more than 100 yards and scored a pair of touchdowns.
Of course, he did; he was on my bench.
In that particular league, which I began as an outlet for friends and family to satisfy their fantasy jones if things weren’t going well in other leagues, I’m 0-5. Not satisfied.
In hindsight, I didn’t have the greatest draft (stupid Falcons!), but I’ve compounded that with some terrible lineup decisions. Green-Ellis and the flex position are at the center of those.
I originally drafted Saints running back Mark Ingram as my primary flex player, thinking he would have a huge rookie season (fantasy owners have few greater enemies than Sean Payton). I was surprised to grab Green-Ellis late, and figured I’d play matchups if Ingram didn’t pan out as I expected.
It’s good to have options, right? Well, not in fantasy football. I’ve long said my perfect fantasy team would be a strong player at each starting position with a worthless bench. That way, I wouldn’t have to worry about picking the wrong guy on a given week. I’ve probably picked the right guy more often than not, but I can’t remember a single instance of that. I never seem to forget when I pick the wrong guy.
This season, in that league, I’m a perfect 5-for-5. A quick breakdown:
Week 1: I drafted Ingram to play him, so I did. His line: 40 yards, no TDs (including being stuffed from the 1 on the last play of the game). Green-Ellis’ line: 34 yards, 1 TD. My line: 0-1.
Week 2: I’m a tad stubborn, so I stick with Ingram. He has to get going, right? Besides, you can’t count on Green-Ellis to score two games in a row, right? Ingram: 51 yards, no TDs. Green-Ellis: 70 yards, 1 TD. Me: 0-2
Week 3: OK, I was wrong. I sit Ingram and put Green-Ellis into my lineup. This is the week my shrewd drafting pays off, negating the stupidity of the first two weeks. Ingram: 38 yards, 1 TD. Green-Ellis: 18 yards, 0 TDs. Me: 0-3.
Week 4: I knew I was right about Green-Ellis! He can’t be counted on! Back to my original plan. I should have stuck to my guns! Ingram: 55 yards, 0 TDs. Green: 75 yards, 1 TD. Me: 0-4. @%$#! Side note: Rookie Stevan Ridley led the Patriots in rushing with 97 yards. OK, I think to myself, I knew Green-Ellis would be phased out. I’m sticking with Ingram.
Week 5: I become pretty smug after Ingram scores a touchdown. That lasts a few hours until my brief TV break. You’d be surprised how much work you can get done while shaking your head and swearing under your breath for 10 minutes straight. Ingram: 32 yards, 1 TD. Green-Ellis: 136 yards (career high), 2 TDs. Me: Done for the season.
I can’t blame all the losses on my flex-position ineptitude, but it certainly hasn’t helped. After obsessing over the flex position for weeks now, I don’t even care if I win anymore, I just don’t want two fantasy running backs — one whose name I can’t spell correctly half the time — ruining my weekends. I NEED to start getting that flex choice right. It’s really the only thing I care about in that league at this point.
Now that I have no chance of making the playoffs, I’ll eventually forget the big stuff, like not drafting a quarterback until the seventh round while placing too much value on that quarterback’s top receiver early in the draft (I could have had Calvin Johnson). And drafting LeGarrette Blount in the third round (I deserve a punch in the face for that one).
So, who should I play this week, Green-Ellis or Ingram? The former faces the Cowboys at home, the latter the Bucs on the road. I have my choice in mind. I’ll give you a hint: it’ll be the wrong one.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Broncos-Chargers game ends with several stabbings
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- American missing in Iran was CIA operative who went rogue
- Obama birther theories float, as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- Kim Jong-un consolidating power or losing grip on North Korea's military
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- PRUDEN: The last living witnesses; they wore the yellow star and remember the Nazi terror
- KEENE: James Clapper should resign for lying to Congress
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow