- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
N. Virginia lawmakers miffed about road-fixing-fund cuts
Question of the Day
A Virginia transportation subcommittee is weighing a funding shift that would chop state maintenance payments to local governments by more than 20 percent, drawing ire from Northern Virginia legislators who already think they don’t get their fair share of cash from Richmond.
The move, under consideration by a Commonwealth Transportation Board subcommittee, would cut $76 million from the state’s $364.6 million local maintenance funding, according to the Virginia Municipal League. For example, using fiscal 2012 figures, the city of Alexandria would take a $318,000 hit, Arlington County would lose $9.2 million, and the city of Leesburg would lose about $717,000 under the change.
“There’s no question it’s going to crimp on our ability to maintain our streets, but the state is going to have to come up with dedicated funding for transportation so we don’t have to be in this boat,” Leesburg Council member Kenneth “Ken” Reid said.
Urban localities in Virginia receive $17,819 from the state for each lane mile of major roads and $10,461 for each lane mile of local roads to help maintain them. State code dictates that Arlington and Henrico, which maintain their own roads, receive $16,896 and $9,395 per lane mile, respectively.
The new formula would shift the allocations so that the 83 localities that maintain their own streets would get $25,600 per lane mile of primary roads and $5,000 per lane mile for all other streets. In most cases, overall funding would be reduced because the localities maintain fewer primary roads than arterial roads.
But Secretary of Transportation Sean T. Connaughton stressed that no one has formally proposed anything yet, and the numbers were merely generated as part of an exercise to determine inequities in road maintenance funding throughout the state.
“People don’t realize that the state spends $5,000 per mile to maintain the secondary roads in Fairfax, then right next door in Arlington we’re putting in $16,000 a mile, and Alexandria get $12,000 a lane mile,” he said. “The question became, ‘Why does that happen’ or ‘what can we do to fix it?’ “
A subcommittee of the board, a 17-member panel appointed by the governor that establishes administrative policies for Virginia’s transportation system, also considered a proposal combining lane-mileage calculations with needs-based budgeting. Other proposals involved vehicle miles and population growth, for example.
But since the amounts provided to Arlington and Henrico are codified, there was a common theme.
“What we have found, in actuality, in looking at all those options, is all of them cut funding to localities,” said Hollis T. Ellis, a member of the subcommittee, which is expected to report back to the board Wednesday.
That notion did not sit well with Fairfax County Supervisor Jeff McKay, chairman of the county’s Transportation Committee.
“It’s essentially a state responsibility, and if we backed away from a county responsibility in the same manner, heads would roll,” Mr. McKay said.
David F. Snyder, Falls Church vice mayor and a member of the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission, was also displeased with the notion.
“There isn’t enough money from the state because the state has refused to raise the gas tax,” he said. “At the same time, it continues to shift the state burden on the localities. The hypocrisy here is glaring.”
Still, shifting more responsibility for roads onto the counties, an age-old proposition known as “devolution,” has once again resurfaced as an option for a state in dire need of long-term funding for transportation. About $450 million supposed to go to construction has instead gone to maintenance this year.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Half can't name political party of their member of Congress, poll finds
- Mich. congressman returns Commerce award after group endorses opponent
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: 'Playing defense on the one-yard line'
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Far out: Astronauts testify from International Space Station
Latest Blog Entries
- Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton 'clearly bears responsibility' on Benghazi
- Holder vows to press ahead on gun control fight
- Seven of 10 prefer that Obama work with Congress, not go around it: Poll
- Schumer: Tea party hasn't let Obama put his policies into effect
- GOP official: Black not running for Wolf's House seat
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- DCCC raising money on suggestion Obama impeachment is 'imminent'
- U.S. evacuates embassy in Libya amid violent clashes between militias
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- CANNON: With Russia, different airline crash, same results
- 3 rockets hit Israel as Hamas rejects Gaza truce
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq