- Rep. Lee: Paul Ryan out of touch with urban Americans
- House votes down resolution to force Issa to apologize
- Kremlin blocks opposition websites; Kasparov fears Putin plans ‘something drastic’
- Saving trees? EPA wastes $1.5 million storing unneeded pamphlets in warehouse
- Scott Brown Senate bid in New Hampshire may launch soon
- Jeffrey Corzine, son of ex-N.J. governor, dead at 31
- Australian surfing magazine sorry for calling indigenous surfer ‘apeish’
- Records: Man in Fla. theater shooting also was texting
- The Putin problem: U.S. needs Russian rockets for spy satellites
- Florida cops ticket toddler in toy convertible: report
U.S. general: New offensive hits Haqqanis
KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — The U.S.-led coalition has unleashed a new offensive against one of Afghanistan’s most lethal militant networks and plans to ramp up operations next year along the border with Pakistan before the American drawdown gathers steam, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan said Wednesday.
Marine Gen. John R. Allen told the Associated Press that the “high-intensity, sensitive” operation that began in recent days was focused on the Haqqani group, a Pakistan-based militant network with ties to the Taliban and al Qaeda. The U.S. has been urging the Pakistanis to clamp down on Haqqani fighters who are attacking Afghan and coalition forces and have been blamed for most of the high-profile attacks in the heart of Kabul.
Gen. Allen would not discuss details of the operation, which began just days ago, only saying, “Every now and again, one of these organizations that has been able to manifest itself on this side of the border is going to have to get some special attention, and that’s what’s happening now.”
In the wide-ranging interview, Gen. Allen also told the AP that the process of handing off security to Afghan forces was going to move faster than initially planned. Afghan President Hamid Karzai wants the Afghan army and police to be in the lead in protecting and defending the nation by the end of 2014.
Asked about Mullah Mohammad Omar, Gen. Allen said the Taliban’s one-eyed, reclusive leader should see this moment as his chance to become a part of the future of Afghanistan. The Taliban has said publicly that it is not interested in negotiating a peaceful resolution to the 10-year-old war, although Afghan and international officials have opened informal dialogue with some insurgents.
“There are elements that work for him that want to be part of the future of Afghanistan,” he said.
Gen. Allen said that while most of the first 10,000 American troops that President Obama ordered withdrawn from Afghanistan by the end of the year will be from support units, roughly one-third will be from combat forces — although not from hotspot areas in southern and eastern Afghanistan.
“Some of the combat forces are going to come out of the north and west,” Gen. Allen said in his office at the heavily fortified coalition headquarters in Kabul.
Gen. Allen said the U.S. would be leaving medical units, mine-clearance troops, and special operations and control personnel in the north and west to support German and Italian forces stationed there.
The 10,000 troops in the first drawdown include two National Guard reserve units, one Army infantry battalion from an area of Afghanistan yet to be determined, one Marine infantry battalion deployed in the south, and military personnel working in headquarters operations and support units.
“We are thinning so one person will now do the job of two people, or we’ll decide that we’re not going to do that job anymore,” he said, adding that some of the work can be done from the United States.
He acknowledged that some civilian contractors would be hired to pick up the slack, but that “it’s not going to be a wholesale replacement.”
To satisfy Mr. Obama’s mandate to withdraw another 23,000 U.S. forces by Sept. 30 of next year, many more combat units will be tapped to leave, he said.
In July, Afghan forces began taking charge of security in seven areas of the country, the first in a six-step transition process. Gen. Allen said the plan is now for the transition to be achieved in five steps — the last starting as early as the fall of 2013 instead of late 2013 or early 2014, as had been discussed.
Initially, the logic was to have Afghan security forces take charge in the most peaceful areas first, he said. Afghan and coalition officials and others, however, recently decided that it would be unwise to transfer the most volatile provinces in 2014, especially when the international force’s footprint will be shrinking.
U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker echoed Gen. Allen’s comment on Sunday during a trip to the western city of Herat, a provincial capital in the first group of areas to start transition.
“The original logic was you go from easy to hard,” he told the AP. “But since you’re going from a lot of troops to fewer troops, there is also a pretty good case to be made for transitioning the hard areas while you’ve got the heavy, ready reserve” on the ground.
Mr. Karzai is expected to announce the second list of transition sites in coming weeks. Gen. Allen said areas being recommended are parts of Herat province, all of Nimroz and additional parts of Helmand provinces in the south, all or parts of Ghor and Daykundi provinces in central Afghanistan, and some municipalities in the east.
If Mr. Karzai approves the recommendations, Afghan forces will be in control or in the process of taking the lead in areas home to 40 percent to 50 percent of Afghanistan’s population, Gen. Allen said.
Insurgents frequently stage attacks on Afghan and coalition forces from the Pakistani side of the border. The U.S., Mr. Karzai and the international coalition have accused Islamabad of giving insurgents, especially the Haqqani network, sanctuary — a claim that Pakistan has denied.
U.S. Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, who until recently was chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has claimed that the Haqqani network is a “veritable arm” of Pakistan’s intelligence service and accused the spy agency of helping the group carry out a recent attack against the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.
That comment stoked outrage among Pakistani officials and fueled speculation that the U.S. would launch a unilateral raid against the Haqqanis in Pakistan, as it did May 2 when it killed al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden.
Gen. Allen said that relations between Washington and Islamabad remain strained but that he was seeing signs of improved Pakistani cooperation. Gen. Allen said he and the Afghan army chief of staff, Gen. Sher Mohammad Karimi, met just days ago in Pakistan with the country’s powerful army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani.
Gen. Kayani pledged to have Pakistani forces take aim at militants firing at coalition troops on the Afghan side of the border.
“That’s really different than it’s been over the last several months,” Gen. Allen said. “And, in fact, this week, for the first time — the first time that we’ve detected it — the Pakistanis actually did fire at an insurgent position that was shooting at us.”
TWT Video Picks
By Emily Miller
Obama is losing the debate on gun ownership, concealed-carry permits
- USS Kidd sent to Indian Ocean after 'indication' of Malaysian jet crash
- F-35 secrets now showing up in Chinas stealth fighter
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Oil rig worker says he saw missing plane go down: report
- GOP bill tries to pull courts into fight with Obama on executive power, enforcing laws
- MILLER: Law enforcement realizes good people with guns deter crime
- NRA shirt gets N.Y. high school student suspended
- VIDEO: Emily Miller on Fox Business on Vivec Murthy for surgeon general and smart guns
- Ben Carson: America's now 'very much like Nazi Germany'
- After three days, Redskins finally address defensive needs
Chaos as Manhattan building explodes
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again