- Mexican train carrying 1,300 migrants headed toward U.S. derails
- Secret Service begins regular K-9 patrols around White House
- Pentagon’s human memory-chip program moves forward
- Obama blasts GOP, ignores immigration crisis in Texas speech
- Marine Warfighting Lab tests the Godzilla of amphibious assault vehicles
- Harry Reid: Birth-control ruling the worst Supreme Court decision in 25 years
- Vet suicides ‘horrible human cost’ of VA dysfunction: lawmaker
- First marijuana customer in Spokane says he was fired
- Hagel: ‘Make no mistake,’ ISIL is an ‘imminent’ threat to U.S.
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to ‘fight for national sovereignty’
HAGELIN: Vaccine bill overrides parents on child health
Question of the Day
Culture Challenge of the Week: Government and Sex-pushers Versus Parents
Democratic California Gov. Jerry Brown has a ticking time bomb on his desk: He must sign a recently passed bill by Sunday for it to become law. His signature, however, would set an explosive precedent: The bill would allow children as young as 12 years old to give valid consent - without their parent's knowledge or permission - to receive vaccines that aim to prevent sexually transmitted diseases.
The groups pushing the governor to sign the bill include the usual "reproductive rights" suspects: the ACLU, NARAL Pro-Choice California and Planned Parenthood, to name a few. Their justification for cutting parents out of the decision-making process is the usual tripe: When it comes to sex, parents cannot be trusted to act in their children's best interests.
The bill meets an urgent need, says its sponsor, Assemblymember Toni Atkins (a lesbian, community organizer and longtime advocate for LGBT special privileges). She argues that letting individual parents decide whether their child should receive, for example, the HPV vaccine amounts to "playing Russian roulette with kids' lives." Why? Because random clinic workers, school nurses or pharmaceutical representatives surely stand in a better position than the child's parents to judge whether - for that particular child - the benefits of receiving the vaccine outweigh the risks.
Parents groups are up in arms, and all Americans should be. STD vaccines (such as Gardasil, which aims to prevent the human papillomavirus, or HPV) are preventive measures - not acute medical emergencies. STDs, while potentially serious, are not public health emergencies on the same order as potential outbreaks of typhoid, diphtheria and other easily communicable diseases. Those air- or water-borne diseases can spread like wildfire through a population.
STD outbreaks, on the other hand, are driven by sexual behavior and individual choice. They do not require massive emergency vaccination campaigns to keep the public safe - and certainly not campaigns that bypass parents and target 12-year-olds.
How to Save Your Family: Be Your Child's Medical Advocate - and Authority
Parents have a right - and a responsibility - to safeguard their children's health. That includes making decisions about whether and when to vaccinate the child against sexually transmitted diseases. A decision not to vaccinate against an STD, particularly for a young child, is a wise decision.
The Gardasil vaccine, for example, protects against HPV infection, including several strains of HPV that cause cervical cancer. But the vaccine itself carries enough risks to give a sensible parent pause. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 8 percent of reported adverse reactions to the vaccine were serious - including at least 32 deaths.
What would happen if a child received Gardasil without the parents' knowledge and suffered an adverse reaction? The parent would be responding blindly to a true medical emergency, unaware of the source of a child's reaction - a situation that could jeopardize not only the child's health, but the child's life.
And for what?
To drive a bigger wedge between parents and children when it comes to sexual behavior and sexual health.
Who benefits? The clinics, drug companies and sex pushers. They need the vaccine to shore up the story they peddle to teens, that the only sexual decision that matters is whether "you're ready." That sex means pleasure, period. Any risks can be prevented with a shot, pill or a little latex. Oh, yes, and an abortion, if something "unexpected" occurs.
Parents need to be vocal advocates, not only for their children's personal health, but also for the principle that parents have the right to make personal health decisions in the best interests of their minor children, without government interference.
Let your children know you are - and will be - their very best advocate when it comes to health - and healthy sexuality. Give them accurate information in the context of your family's beliefs, experience and worldview. Let them know you love them and that no one - not the government, Planned Parenthood or public health agencies - should ever stand between you.
c Rebecca Hagelin can be reached at rebecca@howtosave yourfamily.com.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Senate majority leader practices politics of personal destruction
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- HUSAIN: The fake caliph of 'The Islamic State'
- IRS employee suspended for pro-Obama activities
- HUSAR: Mexicos Pena Nieto passes the immigration bucket
- Va. Democrat reportedly seeks nude shots of Kendall Jones
- Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi denied freedom by Mexican judge
- Pentagon's human memory-chip program moves forward; two universities awarded contracts
- Facebook allows 'Kill Kendall Jones' page, but deletes her game hunting photos
- Amid border crisis, Obama to take 15-day vacation in Martha's Vineyard
- PRUDEN: 'Dirty Harry' Reids increasing eccentricity
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs
U.S.-Ghana World Cup opener