- Al Gore’s climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Army’s 3-D printed bombs will create ‘a whole new universe’ of deadly capabilities
- Hamas calls on Hezbollah to join in fight against Israel
- Senators to FIFA, others: Don’t reward Putin with the World Cup in 2018
- U.S. condemns Israeli shelling of shelter in Gaza
- Obamacare shoots premiums up by 88 percent in California
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama to Republicans: ‘Stop just hatin’ all the time’
- U.S. chemical sites vulnerable despite millions spent on security: Congress
- Driverless cars to hit the British streets by 2015
Sex-ed initiative at heart of House bill battle
Focus on funding for teen program
Question of the Day
The tug-of-war over sex education is back, thanks to a House bill that would fund the Department of Health and Human Services for fiscal 2012 but also would slash an Obama administration-inspired program and divert half the money to abstinence education.
The deadline for a decision is Nov. 18, when Congress‘ temporary spending law expires.
TPP, now funded at $105 million, gives grants to organizations to replicate certain “comprehensive” sex-education programs that have been proven to impact teen pregnancy. TPP grantees must also conduct research on their programs.
The Senate-passed appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) keeps TPP intact, with $113 million. But in its draft funding bill for HHS, the House Appropriations Committee slashes TPP funding to $40 million — and then requires half of the money to go to community based abstinence-education programs.
Supporters of the TPP program are outraged.
“The whole idea behind the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative was to both fund programs that work and build the evidence base” so that “we will have some new data about what works,” said Monica Rodriguez, president and chief executive of the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS).
The House bill is “problematic and hypocritical,” Ms. Rodriguez added. Everyone in Congress is talking about deficit reduction and cost-saving measures, but then they “decimate” the TPP program, which supports programs that work, she said, and divert money to “failed abstinence-only-until-marriage programs.”
Abstinence programs are effective, said Ms. Huber, citing a NAEA report published this year that lists 22 studies — half published since 2008 — that show that abstinence programs can reduce teen sex or affect teen behaviors.
Also, federal data show “a dramatic drop” in teen sexual-activity rates since 1996 — the year abstinence-education funding was first expanded, she said. It’s not possible to attribute this turnaround to a single event, but “we can say with certainty … that abstinence education is an approach that teens are grasping and applying to their lives.”
The TPP funding issue is still in play: The House Appropriations Committee hasn’t marked up its HHS funding bill, so changes to the TPP program are not locked in — unless the committee decides to send its draft straight to the Senate. It is also unknown what will happen to the TPP program when the House and Senate bills are merged.
“We would be happy if the Senate version passed,” said Ms. Rodriguez, of SIECUS, adding that the Senate bill — unlike the House draft — also maintains funding for family planning and other public health programs.
Ms. Huber prefers the House approach of splitting TPP funds between “risk-avoidance” abstinence programs, and “risk-reduction” contraceptive programs. That’s “much more equitable,” especially since the Senate bill “has not a penny” for abstinence education, she said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Mississippi abortion law can't be enforced
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Events honoring 20th National Parents' Day reaffirm family
- '50 Shades' movie trailer outrages anti-porn groups
- Tougher clinic rules lead to drop in Texas abortions
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- HURT: Impeaching Obama is a losing strategy for the GOP
- CARSON: Rudderless U.S. foreign policy
- Patent workers paid to exercise, shop, do chores: report
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Senate overcomes first filibuster of Obama's border-spending bill
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world