- Atheists’ Easter taunt to Christians: ‘Jesus is a myth’
- Miley Cyrus hospitalized, cancels Kansas City show
- Josh Romney swipes Harry Reid with photo tweet of dad paying taxes — ‘your paycheck’
- Despite Obamacare problems, some Dems want Sebelius to run for Senate: report
- Angry New Yorkers shred gun registrations in deadline day protests
- Uninsured rate dropping faster in places that embraced pillars of Obamacare, survey shows
- Hawaii, D.C. give residents two more weeks to sign up under Obamacare
- Climate change causing fish to lose their minds, researchers say
- Great Britain tops World’s Most Sexist Nation list
- Aaron Hernandez investigated for threatening to kill prison guard
Trucking industry’s road rage
ATA ‘fighting’ proposal on drivers’ hours
Potholes and high fuel prices could soon be the least of the trucking industry’s problems.
New federal regulations expected to be released this month would cut the number of hours that tractor-trailer drivers can spend behind the wheel each day, forcing companies to hire more employees and put more trucks on American highways to haul the same amount of goods.
The rule, crafted by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), is designed to alleviate driver fatigue and reduce the number of automobile accidents, but the trucking industry thinks it will do little except drive up prices for every product shipped around the U.S.
“We’re fighting back, and we’re not going to stand still and see our productivity diminish at a time we need to be more productive,” Bill Graves, president and CEO of the American Trucking Associations (ATA), said in a wide-ranging interview with The Washington Times on Monday. Mr. Graves, a Republican, is also a former two-term governor of Kansas.
While praising the administration for some initiatives such as higher fuel-economy standards, the ATA thinks that President Obama’s actions on reducing red tape and creating a more business-friendly environment don’t match his rhetoric.
“He’s saying all the right things in terms of wanting to support business … but when we look in the regulatory trenches, you get a good sense of where the president’s allegiances are,” said Dan E. England, president of C.R. England Inc., a Salt Lake City-based trucking company and the incoming ATA chairman.
“We’re seeing a lot go on in those regulatory trenches that’s imposing greater burdens on all of us,” said Mr. England, who was interviewed alongside Mr. Graves at The Times.
A further crackdown on their industry, Mr. Graves and Mr. England said, is unnecessary, and the current standards are working well for everyone.
Since the first drive-time regulations were put in place in 2004, truckers have been allowed to work 14-hour days. Eleven of those hours can be spent on the highway, with an extra three hours allotted for meals or fueling up.
Each week, they’re also required to take 34 hours off, time most drivers use to head home and visit family or get some much-needed rest.
The proposed changes would shorten the daily driving window to 13 hours. Drivers could then spend only 10 of those hours on the road. The new rules would also lengthen the amount of time truckers must take off each week, increasing it to two periods of midnight to 6 a.m. If a driver finishes his week at 3 p.m. Friday, for example, the new regulations would prohibit him from starting his engine until 6 a.m. Sunday.
Proponents of the changes cite the significant decrease in the automobile accidents and fatalities involving tractor-trailers since the rules were implemented seven years ago. But the trucking industry and other critics think they have an ulterior motive.
“We just think there’s an agenda here, a political agenda that favors organized labor,” Mr. England said. “It would require significantly more trucks to do the same jobs. We would see more congestion on the highways and undoubtedly more accidents. Most people who would be coming in to supplement the ranks would be people relatively new to the industry.”
Those newcomers, Mr. England added, would be more likely to be involved in accidents, defeating the purpose of the rule. While the move would likely create jobs, the regulation would eat away at companies’ bottom lines and force truckers to spend more time at rest stops, watching the clock and waiting until the federal government tells them they can get back on the road.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Biden to lead $600 million work force training effort
- Separation of church and Obama: Religious ties may run deep, but president's attendance has not
- Obamas paid $98K in taxes in 2013, White House says
- Obama calls principal of Pa. high school devastated by stabbings
- Democrats press Obama for Keystone pipeline decision
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By returning to Christian roots, the nation can achieve greatness once again
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- HURT: Wilson and Obama ... 100 years apart, but so alike
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Al Qaeda mocks U.S. in 'extraordinary' Yemen gathering; experts fear CIA caught flat-footed
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.