SNYDER: Reforms won’t solve problems for NCAA

NCAA Division I Board of Directors passed a number of sweeping measures Thursday, Oct. 27, 2011, most notably allowing conferences to vote on providing up to $2,000 in spending money to college athletes. NCAA President Mark Emmert is shown above. (PRNewsFoto/Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics, Lisa Helfert)NCAA Division I Board of Directors passed a number of sweeping measures Thursday, Oct. 27, 2011, most notably allowing conferences to vote on providing up to $2,000 in spending money to college athletes. NCAA President Mark Emmert is shown above. (PRNewsFoto/Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics, Lisa Helfert)
Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

ANALYSIS/OPINION

Paying college athletes always has seemed wrong to me for a number of reasons. All college athletes aren’t big revenue producers. There’s no way to devise an equitable compensation system. Athletes in nonrevenue sports need the funds generated by big-money sports. A college education, along with training, equipment, travel, etc., has real value that shouldn’t be ignored.

But the past few years have loosened my grip on the position, making it harder and harder to defend. Now the NCAA has come out with major reforms regarding financial aid, academic standards, summer basketball recruiting and scholarship limits.

Yet it feels like a case of too little, too late.

I’ve always contended that scholarships are the fairest, most equitable way to “pay” all athletes across the board — as long as the NCAA avoids crazy rules that prevent them from earning income available to other students. College sports are akin to work-study programs at the very least, and they should provide comparable compensation.

Among the sweeping changes it announced last week, the NCAA will allow conferences to vote on providing up to $2,000 in spending money for athletes — what the NCAA calls the full cost of attendance. A similar stipend existed for college athletes until 1972.

NCAA President Mark Emmert rejects the notion that it’s a pay-to-play nod, pointing out that students on nonathletic scholarships receive the same type of “full-cost” payments. Emmert said schools that offer the additional funding will have to do so equally for men and women.

And therein lies one of the biggest problems in this issue, finding the balance between “equal” and “fair.”

Schools in the BCS conferences will have no problem coming up with the money, though it might pain them to give hurdlers and halfbacks the same amount. Non-BCS schools might prefer to compensate only men’s basketball and football players, though not so much the rarely used reserves in those sports.

There are no easy answers here and each possible solution contains unwanted, unintended consequences. For instance: If “School A” offers the extra two grand while fellow conference-member “School B” does not, there goes your level playing field, assuming “School B” doesn’t resort to (more?) illicit measures to keep up.

As far as scholarships go, the new policy is long overdue. Schools will have the option to issue multiyear scholarships and guarantee them for the player’s entire career. Currently, they are renewed annually and can be revoked for any reason — often because the coach found a recruit he likes better.

Yanking scholarships flies in the face of the NCAA’s so-called aim of promoting education through athletics — which is the stated rationale for the organization’s tax-exempt status. It’s bad enough that this amateur sports enterprise rakes in billions of dollars while forbidding the student-athletes from making a buck off their own likeness. But it’s even worse to arbitrarily grant and rescind scholarships, tickets to an education and a better life.

I know my stance on not paying athletes has been the minority opinion, held by a dwindling number of folks with each passing scandal, conference realignment, coaches’ contract and TV deal. I know that crass commercialism based on amateur athletes is inherently incongruous, yet that’s the essence of big-time college sports and the NCAA.

These reforms won’t stop the inevitable shake-up. Facing a slew of lawsuits, a petition going around among student-athletes, questions from Capitol Hill, rebellious conference commissioners, talk of a bowl boycott and efforts to organize college athletes, the NCAA is in a heap of trouble.

And if I had to choose between my basic belief that scholarships are payment enough, and my basic belief that the NCAA is an evil, predatory organization, I’d go with the latter every time. Especially since reading a superb, exhaustive report in the Atlantic.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

About the Author

Deron Snyder

Deron Snyder is an award-winning journalist and Washington Times sports columnist with more than 25 years of experience. He has worked at USA Today and his column was syndicated in Gannett’s 80-plus newspapers from 2000-2009, appearing in The Arizona Republic, The Indianapolis Star, The Detroit News and many others. Follow Deron on Twitter @DeronSnyder or email him at deronwashtimes@gmail.com.

Latest Stories

Latest Blog Entries

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Adobe Flash player