D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier has stood her ground on discretionary demotions of high-ranking officials who do not toe her line, but one casualty of her rigid approach to discipline is not taking his punishment quietly.
Attorneys for veteran Metropolitan Police DepartmentCapt. Hilton Burton — a once-promising commander who now pushes paper in an obscure unit while counting days until retirement — will argue in the D.C. Court of Appeals on Thursday that he was summarily demoted in violation of his due-process rights, and that Chief Lanier is responsible for “a police department afraid to enforce the written law for fear of retaliation by the hierarchy.”
The Burton hearing is a defining moment for the department. It comes on the heels of a recent ruling by an arbitrator who reinstated an inspector demoted by Chief Lanier and ordered the department to pay back salary and benefits — the latest in an increasing line of adverse rulings for the chief.
Capt. Burton joined the D.C. department in 1990 after serving in the Army with the 3d Infantry Regiment (the Old Guard). At the department, he rose steadily, achieving the rank of inspector in 2000 and commander in 2003. In 2007, he was accused of inappropriate use of a department computer and, he said, Chief Lanier demoted him to inspector “without cause.”
While the department argued that Chief Lanier has the authority to demote commanders at will and without a hearing, she nevertheless promoted him back to commander of the Special Operations Division in May 2010.
But in August, after he testified at a D.C. Council hearing that Chief Lanier had publicly misrepresented the department’s policy with regard to celebrity escorts, Capt. Burton was demoted once again and assigned to the Medical Services Division. “I review policies,” he said of his current job.
Capt. Burton said the department cited numerous reasons for his demotion, including a police barricade in Mount Pleasant in which a man died. “All of the issues they cited took place months ago and had nothing to do with my performance,” he said. “I was demoted in reference to my testimony before the city council.”
He said that he has received no documentation to support reasons for his demotion, and that his complaints to the mayor’s office and the D.C. Council have fallen on deaf ears. “That’s the most surprising thing,” he said, “that no one will stand up and say that the chief is wrong and that her actions are going to cost the taxpayers of the District.”
Chief Lanier’s office did not respond to requests for comment. The Office of the Attorney General, which will argue on behalf of Chief Lanier, states in its briefs that Capt. Burton has no right to remain in a rank above captain, regardless of whether his rank was achieved by appointment or promotion as a career officer.
The Court of Appeals, the highest court with local jurisdiction over the District, also will hear an appeal by Capt. Robin Hoey, who was demoted from commander shortly after Chief Lanier took over.
Attorneys for Capt. Hoey will argue that Chief Lanier has discretion to summarily demote only a limited number of her “inner circle of handpicked advisers.”View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Jeffrey Anderson is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Reviews, insights and commentary from an eclectic observer.
Join the Communities. We want to hear from you.
How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?
Life lessons, adventures, people places and observations as I undertake my personal quest to travel to 100 or more countries before I die.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall