- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
Hopefuls court tea party at S.C. forum
Question of the Day
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney promised Monday to support repeal of a full range of financial-regulation legislation enacted over the past few decades as he sought to woo conservative and tea party voters in South Carolina, and pledged that his vice-presidential pick would be pro-life.
Meanwhile, one of his chief opponents for the GOP’s nomination, tea-party favorite Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, saw her campaign manager take a lesser role and her deputy campaign manager quit late Monday as Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s entrance into the race last month continued to roil the field.
Ed Rollins, who stepped down as Mrs. Bachmann’s campaign manager to become an adviser, was frank in his assessment Monday night, telling CNN that Mr. Perry’s entrance into the race has drained both money and attention from Mrs. Bachmann.
Mr. Rollins, in news first reported by Politico, cited health concerns for his decision to step down as manager and said deputy campaign manager David Polyansky had differences with Mrs. Bachmann.
Mr. Perry’s entry also has prompted Mr. Romney to begin competing more aggressively for tea party voters - something he did Monday by promising a repeal of the Obama agenda and pledging fealty to traditional social values when he seeks a running mate.
“I would expect they’d all be pro-life and pro-traditional marriage,” Mr. Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, said at a presidential candidates forum in South Carolina, organized by Sen. Jim DeMint and the American Principles Project and designed to delve more deeply into the fundamental principles of the presidential field.
Mr. Perry, who planned on attending the event, changed his schedule Monday afternoon and returned to Texas to oversee firefighting efforts against spreading wildfires, which means he and Mr. Romney have yet to appear on the same stage in the campaign so far.
In his absence, the other candidates found repeated areas of agreement on undoing the basic parts of President Obama’s tenure, though they disagreed about how far they would go on perennial thorny questions about abortion and foreign policy.
Most of the candidates said they would support an effort to use part of the 14th Amendment to undo the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision, which found a constitutional right to an abortion. Some conservative legal scholars argue that under the 14th Amendment, the federal government can define unborn children under federal law as “persons,” whom the states cannot deprive of life without due process.
However, Mr. Romney warned that such a move could precipitate a “constitutional crisis” among the branches of government.
“I would live within the law within the Constitution as I understand it, without creating a constitutional crisis,” he said.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said he welcomed “a big fight” with lawyers and activist courts, saying the framers of the Constitution intended tension among all three branches of the federal government when it came to powers under the founding document.
He also pointed approvingly to Thomas Jefferson, who as president in 1802 eliminated half of the federal judgeships.
“I am not, I want to be clear here, I am not as bold as Thomas Jefferson. I would do no more than eliminate Judge [Fred] Berry in San Antonio, and the 9th Circuit [Court of Appeals in California]. That’s the most I would go for,” he said. “That’s not a rhetorical comment.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Tom Petty: 'No one's got Christ more wrong than the Christians'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq