- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
NRC: Quake shake exceeded Va. nuclear plant design
A 5.8-magnitude earthquake in the eastern U.S. caused the ground to shake much more than a Virginia nuclear plant was designed to withstand, federal officials said Thursday.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission said preliminary data from the U.S. Geological Survey shows the Aug. 23 earthquake caused peak ground movement about twice the level for which the North Anna nuclear plant northwest of Richmond was designed. The plant is located about 11 miles from the quake’s epicenter in Mineral, Va., and has been shut since the earthquake.
Dominion officials told the NRC that ground movement under the plant exceeded its “design basis” — the first time that has occurred at an operating U.S. nuclear plant. But Dominion said its seismic data from the site showed shaking at much lower levels than those reported by the USGS.
Inspections conducted after the earthquake show there is a safety margin that exceeds the design basis, Dominion said. With few exceptions, safety components evaluated at the plant could withstand shaking even greater than that recorded by the Virginia earthquake, said Eric Hendrixson, Dominion’s director of nuclear engineering.
“That margin was certainly enough for North Anna this time,” he said.
Edwin Lyman, a senior scientist for the Union of Concerned Scientists, said regulators and the nuclear industry should not count on being so fortunate in a future earthquake.
“We think the earthquake should be a wake-up call to the NRC and the industry that they need to reassess the level of risk at every nuclear plant from earthquakes and other natural phenomena and make sure the plants will adequately protect the public,” he said.
“The size of the North Anna earthquake was a surprise, and nuclear regulations should not be based on surprises,” Mr. Lyman said.
The NRC has said it plans to order all U.S. plants later this year to update their earthquake risk analyses, a complex exercise that could take two years for some plants to complete.
The NRC review, launched well before the East Coast quake and the Japan nuclear disaster in March, marks the first complete update to seismic risk in years for the nation’s 104 existing reactors, despite research showing greater hazards.
The two North Anna reactors are among 27 in the eastern and central U.S. that may need upgrades, according to a preliminary NRC review. The plants are more likely to get hit with an earthquake larger than they were designed to handle, the NRC says.
The NRC, using preliminary data from the USGS, said the earthquake caused peak ground movement of about 0.26 g, which is a unit of gravity that measures the impact of shaking on buildings. The North Anna plant was designed to withstand ground movement ranging from 0.12 g to 0.18 g. Tests conducted by Dominion indicate the plant could withstand movement of 0.3 g or higher.
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House pushes through two-year Ryan-Murray budget deal
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow