- - Friday, April 13, 2012


President Obama’s re-election largely hinges on his ability to play young voters for suckers - again - and whether Mitt Romney will let him.

In 2008, Mr. Obama won the youth vote by better than a 2-1 margin, 66 percent to 32 percent. Even more impressive, he expanded the share of young voters going to the polls by some 3 million. Those extra voters helped tip several swing states.

Mr. Obama owed his success to being a charming political unknown onto whom young people could project their hopes. His rhetoric was a hipsterized version of Successories for college kids: “Yes, we can” and “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for!”

His primary opponents were mostly a herd of political dinosaurs who had been around since before the invention not just of the Internet, but of cable TV. Joseph R. Biden Jr., an early primary opponent, had first run for president two years before your typical first-year college student had been born. Even Mr. Obama’s main rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton, had been a fixture on TV news ever since college kids were still in preschool.

Mr. Obama was different. He had that cool name. He was black. He’d never done much that was important, save give some fun speeches, but that was OK; neither had most college students, and that didn’t keep them from being special, either. More important, they believed his promises, they liked his style, they bought his easy answers and flattering pandering.

Four years later, Mr. Obama’s in trouble, which is why he’s visiting college campuses more often than a Red Bull delivery truck. He’s talking louder and getting more shrill because his campaign knows how desperately it needs to replicate - or even come close to replicating - his success with the youth vote in 2008. Polls and countless news stories indicate that young voters are either bored, unimpressed or disappointed with Mr. Obama and with the state of the country.

All of the exciting reasons to vote for Mr. Obama are gone. Even his accomplishments don’t excite people, never mind his failures. His “Yes, we can” rhetoric is gone because it sounds stupid after four years of “No, we didn’t.” Now we get cynicism and fear-mongering. His attacks on the Republicans are tawdry and desperate. He even admits the “Buffett rule” is a gimmick. Other issues, such as green energy, are passe now, even though gas prices continue to soar. (A troubling sign for Mr. Obama: Only a third of hybrid car owners are interested in ever getting another after they get rid of the one they have.)

Mr. Obama’s approval rating among 18-to-29-year-olds hovers around 50 percent (after almost a year of bad press for the GOP). But a late 2011 Harvard survey found that just 12 percent of young people felt the country was moving in the right direction. An outfit called Generation Opportunity, which is trying to organize young voters on economic issues, finds that 77 percent of young people have had to put their lives on hold because of the economy.

In short, conditions are not ripe for an Obama youth tsunami.

The trick for Mr. Romney isn’t to pander to young voters. He’ll never beat Mr. Obama and the Democrats at that game. But Mr. Romney can turn things to his advantage. He needs to contrast himself with Mr. Obama in ways that highlight the president’s desperate need to seem cool to compensate for his failures. Nothing turns off young people more than pretending to be “down with the youth,” as it were.

Indeed, Mr. Romney should take some lessons from Ron Paul on this score. There is quite literally nothing hip or cool about Mr. Paul, but of all the politicians this cycle, he probably generates the most excitement among young voters. Now, part of Mr. Paul’s appeal Mr. Romney cannot copy. Mr. Paul’s esoteric and conspiratorial theorizing about the Federal Reserve, for instance, won’t help Mr. Romney in the general election.

But what Mr. Romney can learn from the 76-year-old Mr. Paul is the appeal of authentic nerd chic. It’s cool to be really into your issues and interests. One of the things that distinguishes the millennial generation is an understanding that nerds - Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs et al. - get things done, and get rich as a result.

After four years of dashed expectations, a studiously uncool Mitt Romney might offer a welcome contrast to Barack Obama’s audacity of hype.

Jonah Goldberg is editor-at-large of National Review Online, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the author of the forthcoming book “The Tyranny of Cliches” (Sentinel HC, May 2012).

Copyright © 2016 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus


Click to Read More

Click to Hide