SIMMONS: Two steps forward, one back in racial progress

Story Topics
Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

In a spirited debate, a panel of four black ideologists sort of answered a pivotal question posed by Frederick Douglass, the statesman, orator and former Maryland slave who, some 21 years after Congress and President Lincoln abolished slavery in the nation’s capital, stood inside a D.C. church and asked: “How stands the [N]egro today?”

The moderator of Saturday’s “Great Debate” as it was officially titled — televised by BET from the newly reopened Lincoln Theatre in recognition of the D.C. Emancipation Act — posed several questions of his own, including one that reflected  Lincoln’s view that a “house divided against itself” over the peculiar institution called slavery cannot stand.

America certainly is a house divided — and the irony is that we are divided because we have the right to exercise unparalleled freedom and the pursuit of happiness as we see fit for ourselves and our families, yet we view race as a divisive issue.

The debate — conducted by the skillful hands of moderator T.J. Holmes — included panelists Julianne Malveaux, educator and remarkable economist; the Rev. Al Sharpton, activist extraordinaire and TV talk-show host; Michael Eric Dyson, educator and social commentator, and the Rev. Joe Watkins, TV political analyst (and the sole Republican).

After laying out those titles, I’ll leave it to you to imagine whose rhetoric was liveliest.

But allow me this: I expected a debate more in line with the timing ofDouglass’ thought-provoking question, which he invoked long after America had waded through the rough-and-tumble era of Reconstruction.

See, I’m thinking America is in the throes of a 21st century reconstruction period.

Whereas the latter half of the 20th century saw what once unfathomable forward process — equal legal protections under federal, state and local laws — American blacks today are in many respects still holding the short sticks, whether those sticks are marked schooling, housing, making ends meet, healthy lifestyles, jobs, entrepreneurialism, justice or the economy.

So my answer to Douglass‘ question is the same as the panelists: There is no question that blacks are better off than they were before and after the War Between States divided America.

It’s just that I wholeheartedly agree with Ms. Malveaux, who says the issue of race is still dividing us, and we’re moving backward in some respects.

That’s why I anticipated a debate about moving forward.

Instead of trying to find a cure for America’s “birth defect” — as former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice once characterized the nation’s race problem — we continue to use hate, blame, color, religion and partisan sniping to further rip the seams of our common bonds.

If we truly believe that Americans are “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,” and “that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” then we should march to the beat of that drum.

What’s past is prologue — the Second Amendment and Trayvon Martin, an economy that has many in a woe-is-me state of mind and the 1 percenters, school-choicers and public-education purists, right-wingers, progressives and everyone in between.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

About the Author
Deborah Simmons

Deborah Simmons

Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...

Latest Stories

Latest Blog Entries

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks