While some Democrats have made it clear that they would rather not be seen with President Obama on the campaign trail this fall, likely Republican nominee Mitt Romney doesn’t appear to face the same problem.
From conservative Republicans in the South to moderates in the Northeast to endangered freshmen out West, Republican lawmakers this week told The Washington Times they would welcome the chance to campaign alongside the former Massachusetts governor, who has all but locked up the nomination.
“Certainly, I’d be happy to,” said Sen. Scott P. Brown of Massachusetts, who is fighting off a tough re-election challenge from Democrat Elizabeth Warren in one of the nation’s most liberal states. “He’s one of the nicest, honest, hardworking men I’ve ever met. When it comes to the economic issues, there is nobody that can compete with his ability to solve problems.”
“I hope he spends a lot of time in Nevada,” said Mr. Heller, who is in his first race since his state’s Republican governor appointed him to the seat resigned last year by John Ensign under the cloud of an extramarital affair.
“This president clearly doesn’t understand and has proven over the last 3 1/2 years that he doesn’t understand how this economy works, and I believe that’s what Gov. Romney brings to the table. He understands finances, he understands the economy and he understands what it’s going to take to turn it around and provide jobs for Nevada and solve the bankruptcy problems we have in the state,” Mr. Heller said.
Of the more than half-dozen Republicans contacted by The Times, not one either refused to comment or said he would not appear with Mr. Romney.
Despite that, the Obama campaign noted that some Republican lawmakers have distanced themselves from Mr. Romney.
“Whether it’s [Michigan Gov. Rick] Snyder criticizing Romney’s ‘Let Detroit go bankrupt’ approach to the auto industry, or Sen. Heller running for the hills when Romney made clear he would let the foreclosure process ‘hit the bottom,’ it’s clear that Gov. Romney tacked too far to the right for even many Republicans around the country,” said Ben LaBolt, Obama campaign spokesman.
Mr. Snyder is not running this cycle, and he would not need to seek re-election until 2014. He endorsed Mr. Romney for the Republican presidential nomination in February, during the run-up to Michigan’s primary and appeared at a Romney rally on the day he made his endorsement public.
It is a different story on the other side of the congressional aisle, where some rank-and-file Democrats have ducked public appearances with Mr. Obama — particularly since, for the first time in his political career, Mr. Obama has begun receiving consistently mediocre public-approval ratings.
Look no further than Sen. Mark L. Pryor of Arkansas, who, despite not being up for re-election until 2014, said last week that he doesn’t plan to actively campaign for Mr. Obama, the leader of his party.
“As much as I may love all of our presidents, I just don’t really get involved in those races. My view is, Democrat, Republican, it doesn’t matter, my view is I’m in Washington to try to work with people,” Mr. Pryor told thecitywire.com, a local website.
This isn’t happening only in conservative states such as Arkansas, where Mr. Obama has little chance of winning in November. Some high-profile Democrats in key presidential swing states also are avoiding his embrace.
Sen. Sherrod Brown, who is up for re-election, was in Ohio when Mr. Obama visited earlier this year, but did not appear with him when he delivered a speech at a high school outside Cleveland. Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri, also up for re-election, was absent from two private fundraisers that the president held in her state late last year.