- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
It takes more time to deliver a baby than in the 1960s, study finds
2.6 hours affects medical norms
While everything else in the modern world is go-go-go, the miracle of birth is actually taking a little longer these days.
An analysis of nearly 138,000 deliveries has found that women in the 2000s averaged 2.6 hours longer to deliver their first child than women in the 1960s, according to a massive new study conducted by researchers at the National Institutes of Health.
A similar outcome was seen for second births, too: Modern mothers, on average, spent two more hours in the delivery room than did their mothers in the 1960s.
The finding matters because medical professionals rely on “normal” labor durations to decide when it’s time to intervene and speed up a delivery.
But the definitions about what’s normal or abnormal for labor are “based on a population of 50 years ago,” said Dr. S. Katherine Laughon, lead author of the study, which is published online in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
“Maybe we need to revisit these definitions,” she said.
A major concern is the increase in Caesarean surgical deliveries, which are riskier for mothers and babies than natural delivery. The new study shows that in the 1960s, 3 percent of first-time deliveries of single babies were Caesarean section, compared with 12 percent of such deliveries in the 2000s.
For years, medical professionals have used guidelines about labor duration “to draw the line in the course of a labor as to when it’s time to intervene with a Caesarean,” said study co-author Dr. D. Ware Branch of Intermountain Healthcare and University of Utah.
Now that there’s evidence that normal labor is actually taking longer than realized, “that certainly calls for a reassessment of when one should draw the line for Caesarean delivery,” Dr. Branch said.
The rise of C-section deliveries in the U.S. is a great concern because of the risks to the woman and the baby, said Maureen Corry, executive director of Childbirth Connection, which has advocated for maternal education and well-being since 1918.
Caesarean section deliveries are associated with blood clots and complications in future births in mothers, and breathing complications and other problems in newborns.
“Are providers rushing into the interventions when there’s no need?” asked Ms. Corry.
Even if the labor is taking longer, “if the mother’s OK and the baby’s OK, there’s no reason to rush into unnecessary interventions,” she said. Having a baby “takes a lot of patience and support.”
Childbirth is the most common reason for hospitalization in the United States, and federal data show that delivery procedures have changed even in the past decade.
The number of vaginal births fell from 79 percent of the total in 1997 to 67 percent in 2008, which means that 1 in 3 births overall is now delivered by use of Caesarean section, said the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) at the Department of Health and Human Services.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Stricter standards force abortion clinics to close; pro-lifers cheer shrinking numbers
- Public accommodations provision in Md. transgender rights bill draws outcry
- German home-school family can stay in U.S. indefinitely
- U.S. Supreme Court declines German home-school case
- Medical facility 'buffer-zone' law in court
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- U.S. deploys 12 F-16 fighter jets to Poland as exercise in response to Ukraine situation
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- Six Senate seats could hinge on Keystone pipeline
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
- Italy outraged over U.S. gun dealer's 'David' ad
- CURL: The modern GOP really is Reagan's 'Big Tent' party
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again