- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
BOOK REVIEW: ‘1948’
It has been 64 years since President Truman pulled the upset victory of the 20th century and historians still can’t get enough of it. Now comes a new book brimming with fresh and detailed information. David Pietrusza’s “1948: Harry Truman’s Improbable Victory and the Year That Transformed America’s Role in the World” contains more human-interest subplots than a Shakespeare play.
It reads like a movie thriller waiting to be filmed, assuming a producer could be found who would not spin Mr. Pietrusza’s objective and well-researched volume to fit Hollywood’s ideological predilections.
Historians would be strained to identify any presidential campaign under this nation’s 225-year old Constitution that arrived at a greater surprise ending than the four-way race of 1948. The result left pollsters, pundits and the campaigns in a state of shock. Only Truman had appeared confident.
His Republican opponent was Thomas E. Dewey, governor of New York. Dewey was smart and a proven crime-buster, but also possessed of “unbridled arrogance.” He was credited (by a detractor) with an ability “to strut while sitting down.”
Dewey’s candidacy was decided officially at a contentious Republican National Convention in Philadelphia. As his support increased in the first two ballots, the non-delegate guests in the gallery (as witnessed by this writer) repeatedly ignored the chairman’s plea not to participate in a voice vote against a “recess” proposed by the New Yorker’s opposition. Dewey backers perceived that measure as an attempt to torpedo the New Yorker’s nomination in a “smoke-filled room.”
The “1948” plot thickened when domestic communists, formerly part of a “united front” with Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, took effective control of a third party whose candidate was Henry Wallace, whom Truman had fired from the Cabinet for his pro-Soviet statements. Truman’s administration itself was bedeviled by an investigation of New Deal official Alger Hiss, an accused Soviet spy who ultimately went to prison.
Meanwhile, the post-Civil War “Solid [Democrat] South” began what would be its decades-long conversion to the GOP. The 1948 campaign plot further thickened when Southern delegates bolted the Democratic National Convention over the civil rights issue. South Carolina Gov. Strom Thurmond became their “Dixiecrat” presidential candidate.
Dewey was advised to talk in platitudes because the election was “in the bag.” His lackadaisical pace resulted in 101 fewer speeches than were made by “underdog” Truman, whose “Give ‘em hell” barnstorming was smilingly described by the president himself (in private) as “demagoguery.”
Mr. Pietrusza spotlights scores of political gems that are little-known, long-forgotten or never before revealed. Examples:
Though touting his civil rights program, Truman had confided to his diary some extremely disparaging insults to minorities, including the N-word.
Truman, more than a half-century removed from President Obama, played the class-warfare card while privately having derided liberals as “the lowest form of politician.”
A communist whose writings boosted Henry Wallace would later mentor a young Obama.
A Capitol Hill love triangle destroyed the Republican chairman of the House committee that exposed the Hiss case. Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, then lobbied by Democrats to replace Truman on their ticket, proposed to fight inflation by imposing a two- or three-year 100 percent corporate profits tax (an idea he walked back after the inevitable uproar).
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
Get Breaking Alerts
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- House votes for bargain to end budget drama
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- U.S. debt jumps a record $328 billion tops $17 trillion for first time
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'