- Arkansas voter ID law struck down by state judge
- FDA proposes ban on e-cigarette sales to minors
- Bad omen? Italian man crushed to death by John Paul II crucifix
- Company stopped from accepting abortion waste
- Girl surprises Michelle Obama with unemployed dad’s resume
- ‘Harry Potter’ religion class seeks to enlighten students on ‘God, sin, and theodicy’
- ‘Optionally piloted’ Black Hawk helicopter clears tests; future missions to go ‘fully unmanned’
- Vice News reporter kidnapped in Ukraine is freed after being beaten, blindfolded
- FCC’s new ‘net neutrality’ proposal sparks outrage among consumer advocates
- Families of ferry’s lost confront South Korean officials
BOOK REVIEW: ‘1948’
It has been 64 years since President Truman pulled the upset victory of the 20th century and historians still can’t get enough of it. Now comes a new book brimming with fresh and detailed information. David Pietrusza’s “1948: Harry Truman’s Improbable Victory and the Year That Transformed America’s Role in the World” contains more human-interest subplots than a Shakespeare play.
It reads like a movie thriller waiting to be filmed, assuming a producer could be found who would not spin Mr. Pietrusza’s objective and well-researched volume to fit Hollywood’s ideological predilections.
Historians would be strained to identify any presidential campaign under this nation’s 225-year old Constitution that arrived at a greater surprise ending than the four-way race of 1948. The result left pollsters, pundits and the campaigns in a state of shock. Only Truman had appeared confident.
His Republican opponent was Thomas E. Dewey, governor of New York. Dewey was smart and a proven crime-buster, but also possessed of “unbridled arrogance.” He was credited (by a detractor) with an ability “to strut while sitting down.”
Dewey’s candidacy was decided officially at a contentious Republican National Convention in Philadelphia. As his support increased in the first two ballots, the non-delegate guests in the gallery (as witnessed by this writer) repeatedly ignored the chairman’s plea not to participate in a voice vote against a “recess” proposed by the New Yorker’s opposition. Dewey backers perceived that measure as an attempt to torpedo the New Yorker’s nomination in a “smoke-filled room.”
The “1948” plot thickened when domestic communists, formerly part of a “united front” with Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, took effective control of a third party whose candidate was Henry Wallace, whom Truman had fired from the Cabinet for his pro-Soviet statements. Truman’s administration itself was bedeviled by an investigation of New Deal official Alger Hiss, an accused Soviet spy who ultimately went to prison.
Meanwhile, the post-Civil War “Solid [Democrat] South” began what would be its decades-long conversion to the GOP. The 1948 campaign plot further thickened when Southern delegates bolted the Democratic National Convention over the civil rights issue. South Carolina Gov. Strom Thurmond became their “Dixiecrat” presidential candidate.
With the old Roosevelt coalition splitting the Democratic Party three ways, the conventional wisdom was that Truman was doomed.
Dewey was advised to talk in platitudes because the election was “in the bag.” His lackadaisical pace resulted in 101 fewer speeches than were made by “underdog” Truman, whose “Give ‘em hell” barnstorming was smilingly described by the president himself (in private) as “demagoguery.”
Mr. Pietrusza spotlights scores of political gems that are little-known, long-forgotten or never before revealed. Examples:
Though touting his civil rights program, Truman had confided to his diary some extremely disparaging insults to minorities, including the N-word.
Truman, more than a half-century removed from President Obama, played the class-warfare card while privately having derided liberals as “the lowest form of politician.”
A communist whose writings boosted Henry Wallace would later mentor a young Obama.
A Capitol Hill love triangle destroyed the Republican chairman of the House committee that exposed the Hiss case. Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, then lobbied by Democrats to replace Truman on their ticket, proposed to fight inflation by imposing a two- or three-year 100 percent corporate profits tax (an idea he walked back after the inevitable uproar).
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Holder cancels appearance in OKC amid angry protests
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- HURT: President Obama's 'Selfie Doctrine'
- Nevada rancher's racial remarks cost him range of support
- 'Conservatives' should feel exposed by Bundy's racist comments: Scarborough
- PRUDEN: Obama's fishy Asian adventure
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Don't punish unborn for parents' sins
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Fraud minimal in house-call health care
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Palestinian Authority on 'jihad-care'?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Recalling foresight of Reagan, Thatcher on SDI
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: A double standard on pejoratives?