- Jimmy Carter’s grandson: People have right to sport Confederate battle flag license plate
- Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to N.J. gun law
- Sharyl Attkisson: Media Matters ‘clearly targeted me’
- Sherpas consider boycott after Everest avalanche
- Democrat Rep. Stephen Lynch on Obamacare: ‘We will lose seats’ this November
- Syria to hold presidential election on June 3
- People will be safe at 118th Boston Marathon, Mayor Marty Walsh says
- Boy Scout, 12, killed by rolling tree during troop outing at Washington park
- South Korean president: Ferry crew actions ‘murderous’
- President Obama poised to grant clemency to nonviolent drug offenders: report
Vegas scandal drives Senate to police agency conferences
Spending rules attached to bill
Reacting swiftly to the scandal over a Las Vegas spending spree by employees at the General Services Administration, the Senate moved Tuesday to require federal agencies to do more to justify conferences and imposed a $500,000 limit on spending for each meeting.
Lawmakers easily voted to attach those restrictions to a bill overhauling the U.S. Postal Service to try to set the blighted agency on firmer financial footing.
The new rules on agency conferences, which still would have to pass the House and be signed into law to take effect, were proposed just weeks after a report said GSA employees spent $820,000 on a lavish conference that included a fortune teller and $7,000 spent on sushi. That auditor’s report led to the resignation of the head of the GSA and could lead to criminal charges.
Sen. Tom Coburn, the Oklahoma Republican who proposed the rules, said he didn’t want to end conferences but that it was time to impose restrictions that would make agencies think more carefully about what they approve.
“This is just simple, good government transparency,” Mr. Coburn said. “It’s simply a good government program to get some visibility on what we’re spending on conferences.”
His amendment was adopted by voice vote as part of the Postal Service bill.
Seeking a blueprint that achieves the necessary savings for the Postal Service without shuttering too many offices, lawmakers passed amendments making it harder to close post offices but left open the door to eliminating Saturday service two years from now. They also preserved cuts to Postal Service workers’ compensation.
Facing an $8.3 billion budget gap this year, Postal Service officials had told Congress that the agency needed to act by next month or it would start shutting down some post offices and mail processing centers, scale back to five-day service and raise stamp prices. The agency has been running up massive deficits for years as fewer Americans use mail services and the economy struggles to recover from a recession.
Lawmakers said they came up with a more measured approach that would ease in reforms while making sure Americans still have access to postal services.
Sponsored by Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut independent, and Susan M. Collins, Maine Republican, the plan would direct the Postal Service to downsize post offices and mailing centers instead of closing them, cut down on bloated workers’ compensation costs, and make it easier for the agency to prepay retiree health care benefits.
Even though the legislation is supported by Republicans and Democrats, it didn’t pass without a fight, as some budget hawks tried to shoot it down under budget rules, charging that the proposal would violate debt ceiling limits set last summer.
According to the Congressional Budget Office’s official score, the bill would add $34 billion to the deficit under federal accounting rules.
Supporters, though, said that was an accounting quirk caused by the way the independent agency’s funds are counted against the federal budget. They said some money is a refund the Postal Service should receive anyway while the rest will be funded by post office customers, not taxpayers in general.
“We are not talking about tax dollars from the Postal Service … so I urge my colleagues to vote for the motion to waive,” Ms. Collins said. “If they do not and this bill falls, it will spell the end of the Postal Service.”
As often happens with bipartisan legislation that is likely to pass, lawmakers introduced dozens of amendments through Tuesday afternoon. They appeared willing to tweak the bill but were more hesitant to enact major changes.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- No comment on petition to deport Bieber
- Red-state Democrats blast latest Keystone delay
- 'Deport Bieber' petition draws no comment from White House
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador's visa, but says law is 'advisory'
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Twitter blocks accounts critical of Turkish government
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- CURL: Shelly O first lady Michelle Obama comes in last
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Building a D.C. memorial for an endless war bumps into regulations
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.