- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
- Detroit porch shooting trial: Suspect says he didn’t know gun was loaded
- U.S. Navy admiral ‘receptive’ to giving Chinese counterpart a tour of carrier
- Islamic State orders female genital mutilation for Mosul girls, U.N. says
- Israeli fire hits U.N. facility in Gaza, killing 15
- Obama encourages ICE to stand down, say former border agents
- Pro-Palestinian protesters attack Israeli soccer team in Austria match
- Virginia police: 2 dead after storm at campground
- Ukrainian prime minister announces resignation
- House members question $17 billion VA request
Vegas scandal drives Senate to police agency conferences
Spending rules attached to bill
Question of the Day
Reacting swiftly to the scandal over a Las Vegas spending spree by employees at the General Services Administration, the Senate moved Tuesday to require federal agencies to do more to justify conferences and imposed a $500,000 limit on spending for each meeting.
Lawmakers easily voted to attach those restrictions to a bill overhauling the U.S. Postal Service to try to set the blighted agency on firmer financial footing.
The new rules on agency conferences, which still would have to pass the House and be signed into law to take effect, were proposed just weeks after a report said GSA employees spent $820,000 on a lavish conference that included a fortune teller and $7,000 spent on sushi. That auditor’s report led to the resignation of the head of the GSA and could lead to criminal charges.
Sen. Tom Coburn, the Oklahoma Republican who proposed the rules, said he didn’t want to end conferences but that it was time to impose restrictions that would make agencies think more carefully about what they approve.
“This is just simple, good government transparency,” Mr. Coburn said. “It’s simply a good government program to get some visibility on what we’re spending on conferences.”
His amendment was adopted by voice vote as part of the Postal Service bill.
Seeking a blueprint that achieves the necessary savings for the Postal Service without shuttering too many offices, lawmakers passed amendments making it harder to close post offices but left open the door to eliminating Saturday service two years from now. They also preserved cuts to Postal Service workers’ compensation.
Facing an $8.3 billion budget gap this year, Postal Service officials had told Congress that the agency needed to act by next month or it would start shutting down some post offices and mail processing centers, scale back to five-day service and raise stamp prices. The agency has been running up massive deficits for years as fewer Americans use mail services and the economy struggles to recover from a recession.
Lawmakers said they came up with a more measured approach that would ease in reforms while making sure Americans still have access to postal services.
Sponsored by Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut independent, and Susan M. Collins, Maine Republican, the plan would direct the Postal Service to downsize post offices and mailing centers instead of closing them, cut down on bloated workers’ compensation costs, and make it easier for the agency to prepay retiree health care benefits.
Even though the legislation is supported by Republicans and Democrats, it didn’t pass without a fight, as some budget hawks tried to shoot it down under budget rules, charging that the proposal would violate debt ceiling limits set last summer.
According to the Congressional Budget Office’s official score, the bill would add $34 billion to the deficit under federal accounting rules.
Supporters, though, said that was an accounting quirk caused by the way the independent agency’s funds are counted against the federal budget. They said some money is a refund the Postal Service should receive anyway while the rest will be funded by post office customers, not taxpayers in general.
“We are not talking about tax dollars from the Postal Service … so I urge my colleagues to vote for the motion to waive,” Ms. Collins said. “If they do not and this bill falls, it will spell the end of the Postal Service.”
As often happens with bipartisan legislation that is likely to pass, lawmakers introduced dozens of amendments through Tuesday afternoon. They appeared willing to tweak the bill but were more hesitant to enact major changes.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Whistleblowers flood VA with lawsuits despite apology
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Obama dispatches researchers to border to check on National Guard
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Astronaut shares 'saddest photo' from space: Bombs bursting over Israel, Gaza
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq