- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
Pakistani drone critic granted visa for U.S. conference
Question of the Day
A Pakistani lawyer who is suing the CIA to stop its campaign of lethal drone attacks against top terrorists there has been granted a visa to enter the United States to publicize his case.
The decision to admit Mirza Shahzad Akbar may prove controversial.
One of his clients in the lawsuit, who says his relatives were civilian casualties of a drone strike, deliberately outed the CIA station chief in Islamabad in December 2010. The chief had to be withdrawn hurriedly.
He will be a keynote speaker at a conference this weekend in Washington organized by legal critics of the CIA drone strike program and feminist antiwar group Code Pink.
Mr. Akbar said the visa decision came after “14 months of delay” by U.S. consular officials. He first applied last year to visit the United States to speak at a similar conference last May in Boston.
The CIA declined to comment, and a State Department official that privacy laws prohibit comment on individual cases.
“Visas are granted unless an applicant is found inadmissible in accordance with the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act,” the official said in an e-mail. “U.S. law does not grant authority to deny visas solely on the basis of political statements or views.”
Mr. Akbar and other critics of the drone program claim that hundreds of innocent civilians have been killed in the attacks, and say they violate international law. He has argued that the attacks are fueling extremism in Pakistan, where reports of civilian casualties have incited public anger.
“I believe the American people are good people and will want to do something to stop this unjust, counterproductive war that violates all norms of international law and human rights,” Mr. Akbar said.
U.S. officials have defended the drone program as lawful under authorities granted the CIA by the president, and say the estimates of civilian casualties produced by Mr. Akbar and his supporters are exaggerated.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- Hezbollah warring in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Despite rhetoric, gun prosecutions plummet under Obama
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq