- JetBlue pilots vote to unionize; 2 previous attempts failed
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with ‘full-time’ robots
- Navy’s military dolphins may meet Putin’s porpoises in Black Sea
- Forget the Porsche — it’s the guy with the Prius that attracts the ladies, poll shows
- Fired Russian Facebook CEO says site has fallen in the hands of pro-Putin supporters
- Sen. Boozman of Arkansas has emergency heart surgery
- Brazil embraces drones to save the Amazon rain forest
- Teen stowaway shows holes in vast airport security
- Supreme Court to decide if passports can say ‘Jerusalem, Israel’
- Cries of anguish as South Korea ferry toll tops 100
LAMBRO: What Obama won’t say as he campaigns
President is silent on his overspending that pushes U.S. toward cliff’s edge
President Obama officially has begun his 2012 campaign, telling special-interest groups what the government will do for them if he is elected to a second term.
But the question many people are asking are: What else is he running on besides government handouts? What is his second-term agenda? What is he planning to do if he wins? Well, he doesn’t say.
There is no hint of a grand plan for dealing with the mountain of unfinished problems he has left behind in the nation’s capital as he piles up frequent-flyer miles in hot pursuit of his singular goal: becoming a two-term president.
His campaign rhetoric thus far gives us no clue that he intends to address the big problems that still need to be fixed. He knows what they are because polls tell us what America’s primary concerns are: a lackluster, slow-growth, subpar economy and far too few jobs; a monster $1.2 trillion budget deficit, the fourth of his big-spending presidency; and a $16 trillion debt by the end of this year.
But Mr. Obama isn’t talking about a mediocre economy that appears to be slowing down - again.
He isn’t talking about jobs or bemoaning the fact that many college grads - who this week he promised an extension of low-interest student loans - can’t find work that will allow them to pay back the government.
As for the loan extension Mr. Obama is pushing on the campaign trail, it’s interesting to note that in 2007, then-Sen. Obama missed two pivotal Senate votes on the bill that created the program.
He is embracing it now because he needs the support of younger voters to save his presidency, but he did not vote for the original bill or its final passage, and didn’t bother to sign on as a co-sponsor, according to a report in Tuesday’s Politico.
This week he was speaking at universities in North Carolina, Colorado and Iowa to champion extending the loan program. Maybe a student will ask him: Why he didn’t take the time to vote for it in the first place? But let’s not trifle over small matters. He was too busy running for president in 2007 to be bothered with student loans and doing his job as a senator for which he was paid $174,000 a year. Let’s move on to other matters.
How about more than $5.3 trillion in four consecutive budget deficits? What deficits? The national debt? What debt? No one cares about those issues, do they?
But when the Gallup Poll asked voters, “What would you say worries you most about the national economy at this time?” the secod most frequent response (after jobs/unemployment) was the national debt and the federal budget deficit.
Mr. Obama is dead silent on both issues, despite millions of worried Americans, who fear we are plunging into a black hole of European-style debt that will engulf our economy.
Also missing from his stump speech is any mention of $4-plus gas prices that are cleaning out consumer wallets and crushing struggling small businesses - or what he intends to do about it. He could have begun by approving the Keystone XL pipeline that would have pumped enough oil down to the Gulf Coast to drive down oil and gas prices.
Mr. Obama, who put the environmental lobby ahead of jobs, household budgets and businesses, killed the deal that would have created 20,000 jobs - 13,000 in construction and 7,000 in manufacturing.
The Washington Post’s economics columnist Robert J. Samuelson called his decision “an act of national insanity.” But that’s yesterday’s news, and you won’t hear the president mentioning it in his campaign speeches any time soon.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Feds who send arms against ranch families betray American values
Get Breaking Alerts
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, renegade
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- IRS revokes conservative group's tax-exempt status over anti-Clinton statements: report
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Supreme Court pushes consideration of N.J. gun case to April 25
- Bonuses given to IRS employes who owed back taxes
- Court's affirmative action ruling: A step toward respecting states' rights
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Pat Buchanan sums up Nevada ranch standoff: Sending 'Seventh Cavalry to collect a bill'