- HUMPRHIES: The Liberal Bully of the Week is …
- Secret Service threatened to kill Mr. Met if he got close to President Clinton, book claims
- Sarah Palin to campaign for Senate candidate Ben Sasse in Nebraska
- Boise business entices customers to come break stuff — ‘recreational destruction’
- Fired Yahoo exec’s $60 million golden parachute may be a record
- Arkansas gynecologist snapped nude photos of patients, police say
- Anthony Weiner on his current sexting habits: ‘None of your business’
- Producers eye Capitol Hill for latest reality TV hit
- No selfie awareness: Obama, Biden mug for Instagram as Ukraine implodes
- Putin to Snowden: We don’t collect droves of data on everyone like the U.S.
Gas boom may stop at coast of Maryland
Sierra Club fights Dominion plans
Cove Point in Southern Maryland has become the latest flash point in the fight between the fossil fuels industry and its longtime foes in the environmental movement.
Citing a unique Carter-era agreement, the Sierra Club says it will veto plans by energy giant Dominion to build the first natural gas liquefaction and export facility on the East Coast, a site that would handle booming supplies from the Marcellus Shale and other vast deposits for shipment to Asia and elsewhere.
The 1970s legal settlement, the Sierra Club argues, gives it the authority to halt any project that would “change the footprint” at Cove Point, which currently hosts a little-used natural gas import facility and includes sites designated as Maryland natural heritage areas.
Dominion maintains that the project, which could export about 750 million cubic feet of gas per day and would create thousands of jobs, satisfies the agreement, and the firm has all intentions of moving forward, whether environmentalists like it or not.
Neither side denied Thursday that they will end up in litigation over the proposed facility, which Dominion plans to begin constructing as early as 2014 and expects to have operational by 2017.
“As with any project of this magnitude, we would expect some opposition from various special interest groups,” Dominion President and CEO Thomas F. Farrell II said in a statement. “We have reviewed the regulations and agreements governing the site and are confident we can locate, construct and operate … the facility with minimal environmental impacts.”
The Sierra Club says the plant would harm coastal forests, pollute the Chesapeake Bay and be indirectly responsible for environmental damage in other areas.
By taking advantage of huge natural gas reserves in Pennsylvania, Ohio and other states, environmentalists argue, Dominion is promoting hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, the practice of using water, sand and chemicals to crack deep underground rock and release huge quantities of fuel.
Environmentalists have long argued that the process ruins drinking water supplies and leads to air pollution. Oil and gas industry leaders say it’s safe.
“The damage that this project would bring to the Maryland coast, as well as the disastrous effects of the fracking boom on communities in states like Pennsylvania, make it clear that exporting liquefied natural gas is bad news for Americans’ air, water and health,” Sierra Club Executive Director Michael Brune said Thursday. “The Sierra Club cannot and will not support [natural gas] exports from Cove Point, and we will reject Dominion’s proposal.”
Sierra’s clout in Cove Point appears to be unique, and Dave O’Leary, the Maryland chapter chairman, said he is proud that his chapter is “the first” responsible for rejecting what he called “dirty liquid natural gas exports.”
The decades-old agreement dates back to Cove Point’s construction.
Several groups, including the Sierra Club, signed onto a contract dictating the types of facilities that can be built there and exactly where they could be located in order to minimize environmental disturbances. Dominion is now subject to that document, and a 2005 change, Sierra argues, prohibits using Cove Point for exports.
Despite Sierra’s reservations, the company says, it can build the plant with little or no additional disturbance to the surrounding landscape. It also is stressing the huge economic shot in the arm the project could provide, including at least $1 billion in taxes to federal, state and local governments and a significant dent in the nation’s annual trade deficit.
The construction of natural gas export facilities also represents a dramatic change for the U.S. energy sector. A decade ago, analysts were predicting that the nation would have to begin importing huge quantities of the fuel in order to meet Americans’ demand. But the discovery of the Marcellus and other shale reserves has completely changed the equation.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Beau Biden announces Delaware gubernatorial bid
- Selfies still allowed as Obama poses with Biden
- Obama unveils new $600 billion jobs initiative
- Biden to lead $600 million work force training effort
- Separation of church and Obama: Religious ties may run deep, but president's attendance has not
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Removal of military gear limits options for U.S., NATO in Ukraine
- Joe Biden's first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- CURL: The state of the Union worse than you thought
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.