- Associated Press - Tuesday, April 3, 2012

INDIANAPOLIS — Austin Carroll was fighting insomnia when he turned to Twitter for relief and casually dropped the F-word multiple times, apparently to demonstrate to his followers that the expletive would fit almost anywhere in a sentence.

But his middle-of-the-night profanity quickly cost the Indiana teen. A few days later, Austin was expelled from high school over his foul-mouthed lapse, even though the word wasn’t directed at anyone, and he says the tweet didn’t involve his school.

Now the 17-year-old senior is at the center of a debate over how closely school officials may monitor students’ online activities when they aren’t in class or even on school property, an issue that has frustrated administrators and confounded courts.

Austin insists he made the tweet on his own time using his own computer, making it none of the school’s business. The facts could spell the difference between a routine school discipline case and a broader First Amendment dispute.

School officials say they cannot discuss a student’s disciplinary record and will not say why Austin was expelled March 19 from Garrett High School, a 600-student school where younger students are given iPads and older ones are sent home with MacBooks.

“It was either on the school network or one of the school computers,” said President Tony Griffin, vice president of the Garrett-Keyser-Butler school district, north of Fort Wayne. “It wasn’t any of his own personal network or computer that caused this.”

His mother, Pam Smith, thinks it was in retaliation for her son’s previous misbehavior, which included a suspension earlier in March for violating the dress code by wearing a kilt to school and a suspension last fall for using the same expletive on a school computer. Then on March 16, her son tweeted the F-word again.

Austin, who did not respond to interview requests from the Associated Press, told Fort Wayne television station WPTA that he was just trying to be funny.

“If my account is on my own personal account, I don’t think the school or anybody should be looking at it. Because it’s my own personal stuff, and it’s none of their business,” he told the station.

He posted on his Facebook page that he “shouldn’t have done it” but said the punishment was too harsh.

First Amendment and students’ rights experts agree with him. If Austin was using his own computer and network to send the tweet, the school’s action was “an incredible overreach and overreaction that arguably raises not only First Amendment but Fourth Amendment issues” related to search and seizure, said David Hudson, a scholar at the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee.

Copyright © 2016 The Washington Times, LLC.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide