- Obama dispatches researchers to border to check on National Guard
- Dutch receiving Malaysia plane bodies irked at Putin’s daughter in Holland
- Algerian airplane goes missing over Mali: ‘Emergency plan’ launched
- Colorado judge strikes voter-backed gay marriage ban, but issues stay
- Brooklyn Bridge flag-swapping suspects identified by nickname
- Christian woman in Sudan spared for apostasy flies to Italy
- Iraq: 60 dead in attack on prisoner convoy
- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
Appeals court hears case for gay marriage
Equal protection under the law cited for striking down federal ban
Question of the Day
A three-judge federal appellate court heard arguments Wednesday on whether a 1996 federal law that defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman - thus denies marital benefits to gay couples married under state law - is constitutional.
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) amounts to “across-the-board disrespect” of gay couples who were married under Massachusetts law, Mary L. Bonauto, lead attorney for the 17 gay plaintiffs, told the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston.
“The promise of equal protection is that likes are to be treated alike,” said Ms. Bonauto, who directs the civil rights project at Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders.
“But DOMA treats married same-sex couples differently from all other married persons, making gay people and our marriages unequal to all others,” she said.
The case, Gill et. al., v. Office of Personnel Management, is a consolidation of three similar cases, and is named for postal worker Nancy Gill. It argues that DOMA illegally prevents gay spouses from accessing federal marital benefits that are available to heterosexual spouses. These include Social Security survivor benefits, eligibility to be on a spouse’s federal health insurance plan, and the ability to file federal taxes as a married couple.
One of the plaintiffs is Dean Hara, who married former Rep. Gerry Studds, Massachusetts Democrat. Mr. Studds, the first openly gay member of Congress, died in 2006, and Mr. Hara is denied the pension given to surviving spouses of former members of Congress.
Former Solicitor General Paul Clement defended DOMA on behalf of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the House of Representatives.
Mr. Clement, who recently argued against the Obama administration’s health care law in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, told the appellate court Wednesday that Congress had rational reasons to enact DOMA and preserve the historical definition of marriage in federal statutes and programs.
In 1996, Hawaii appeared ready to legalize gay marriage - a move that would have affected other states and the federal government, Mr. Clement said.
States can enact their own definitions of marriage, but Congress has the constitutional right to define marriage for federal purposes, he said, adding that changes to a national definition of marriage should be done through the electoral process.
In 2010, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Tauro ruled in favor of the Gill plaintiffs, saying that DOMA violated their constitutional guarantees of equal protection and “encroached” on states’ rights to define marriage.
Wednesday’s oral arguments marked the first time a DOMA case reached a federal appellate court.
In 2011, President Obama and the Department of Justice announced they would not defend DOMA because they believed it to be unconstitutional.
The appellate panel that heard the oral arguments were Chief Judge Sandra Lynch, Judge Michael Boudin, and Judge Juan Torruella.
• This article is based in part on wire service reports.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- David Tyree hired by Giants in a move bashed by gay-rights groups
- JAMA opinion piece calls for ending lifetime ban on blood donation by gay men
- HIV rate drops in U.S. for most groups; percentage for young gay, bisexual men up
- VH1's 'Naked Dating' outrages parents group
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Algerian airplane goes missing over Mali: 'Emergency plan' launched
- Despite rhetoric, gun prosecutions plummet under Obama
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- CROWLEY: The good-time president
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Hezbollah in Syria could join fight against Israel
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Poor Hillary, rock-star wannabe
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq