- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
Obama takes a break for some bipartisanship
Signing ceremonies for Stock Act, Jobs Act emphasize joint efforts
Question of the Day
The Stock Act requires senators, House members, top administration officials and federal judges to report most financial transactions of $1,000 or more within 45 days. Transactions involving widely held mutual funds, pension plans or similar investments are exempt.
“The president seized on the public outrage, urged Congress to quickly pass legislation and then wasted no time signing the bill into law,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
Though Ms. Sloan accused the House of weakening the Stock Act, she said she still favors the new law because it will force members to disclose their stock trades, enabling the public to compare them with congressional action.
Some legal experts doubted the need for an additional law aimed specifically at lawmakers’ activity, considering that existing laws prohibiting insider trading are supposed to apply to everyone.
Tamar Frankel, a law professor at Boston University, suggested the law passed because it gives both sides something to agree on in an otherwise hotly partisan climate.
“I am not sure that we needed a law to specify these prohibitions in misappropriating insider information that they received in the performance of their functions,” she said. “But if the statute is a way to bring the warring parties to agree on something, the statute is welcome.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Susan Crabtree is an award-winning investigative reporter with more than 15 years of reporting experience in Washington, D.C. Her reporting about bribery, corruption and conflict-of-interest issues on Capitol Hill has led to several FBI and ethics investigations, as well as consequences for members within their caucuses and at the ballot box. Susan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP senators want IG probe of Sebelius' 'Obamacare' fundraising
- Teaming up with Christie, Obama says Jersey shore 'back in business'
- No Moore: Obama flubs name of Oklahoma city devastated by tornado, calls it 'Monroe'
- Obama to Okla. tornado victims: 'We have got your back'
- Aide involved in Benghazi talking points scrubbing promoted by Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Islamic militants seize Benghazi as U.S. evacuates Libya
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world