- Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
Panel witnesses, senators call for aid to Syria rebels
Question of the Day
Failed efforts to curtail escalating violence in Syria led policy experts to unanimously call for direct U.S. assistance to rebel forces during a hearing at the Capitol on Wednesday, pushing for a new intelligence operation to identify legitimate opposition leaders and supply them with military support.
Experts cited the country’s civil war, which according to activists has claimed 19,000 lives so far and shows fews signs of abating, as an increasingly likely spark for widespread ethnic conflict across the Middle East.
With the Assad government composed mostly of Alawites — a branch of Shiite Islam — and the opposition hailing mostly from the Sunni sect, many fear a drawn-out war in Syria could lead to violence elsewhere and give extremist organizations like al Qaeda a foothold in the region.
“Time is an important component in this. The longer it goes on, the greater the prospect that the very people you least want to see involved become more engaged,” said Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, at the start of the hearing. “The faster it were to change, the less prospect there is for the kind of disruption that threatens the region.”
The hearing, the committee’s last before the August recess, was convened as a response to ineffective international diplomacy.
China and Russia, wary of U.S. and European interests, continue to block Security Council relations that would imposed tough sanctions or authorized military force against the Syrian government. Thus far, the international community has only agreed on humanitarian aid and a peace-keeping operation.
Among several proposals on Wednesday, one consensus became clear: the U.S. must reach out to opposition leaders directly.
“The key decision here is to focus on the insiders rather than the outsiders,” said Martin Indyk, vice president of the Brookings Institution and former ambassador to Israel. “We’ve spent a lot of effort with the outsiders, and frankly it’s failed — at least so far. To get them all to work together in an effective way seems to be a forlorn mission.”
Each panel member said the U.S. must begin aiding the opposition leaders that are committed to a overthrowing dictator Bashar Assad — a development most at the hearing viewed as an inevitable — with at least intelligence information and military equipment.
“Once we’re satisfied that these are the right people to be arming — people who have some responsibility and consistency — then we should be arming them,” Mr. Indyk said.
The panel stopped short of advocating for immediate intervention by U.S. troops, but James Dobbins of the RAND Corporation said such a move could be acceptable if Syrian opposition forces requested it and several other Arab nations supported it.
Mr. Dobbins said the U.S. should at the moment offer its support to those countries which have an interest in the conflict, such as Turkey, which has seen thousands of refugees flood its border in the last year, or the primarily Sunni Saudi Arabia.
“The U.S. should not become the standard-bearer for such an intervention,” Mr. Dobbins said. “The U.S. should up its assistance to the rebels (and) quietly let those on the front lines know that it will back initiatives they may wish to take.”
Despite the support from the panel to increase U.S. involvement, several committee members questioned the need. Sen. Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, the panel’s top Republican, expressed concerns over the cost of these efforts and whether citizens would support them.
Mr. Kerry also cautioned that the opposition is disorganized, and that finding a movement to heavily support could prove challenging.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq