HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — More than a month after an explosive investigative report accused ousted Penn State President Graham Spanier of burying child-sex-abuse allegations against Jerry Sandusky, Mr. Spanier so far has avoided criminal charges — unlike two of his former subordinates.
That doesn’t mean he’s in the clear, according to legal experts.
As attorneys for Athletic Director Tim Curley and retired Vice President Gary Schultz urged a Dauphin County judge Thursday to dismiss the case against them, Mr. Spanier remains vulnerable to criminal charges over his alleged role in a scandal that has shaken Penn State to its core, outside lawyers said.
Former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s university-commissioned report, which accused the ex-president — along with Mr. Curley, Mr. Schultz and football coach Joe Paterno — of covering up a 2001 allegation against Sandusky, could help lay the groundwork for a prosecution.
“The Freeh report, whose findings of fact and conclusions were not challenged by PSU, suggests potential liability for Spanier,” said Paul DerOhannesian, an Albany, N.Y., defense attorney and former sex-crimes prosecutor who has been following the Penn State case.
“If I was in the state AG’s office, I would seriously be looking at” a criminal case against Mr. Spanier, said another defense lawyer, Will Spade, a former Philadelphia prosecutor who worked on a grand jury investigation of priests about a decade ago.
A spokesman in the attorney general’s office, Nils Frederiksen, declined to comment, citing an “ongoing and active investigation” into the Sandusky matter.
There could be a number of reasons why prosecutors haven’t moved against Mr. Spanier, who led Penn State for 16 years until leaving office under a cloud four days after Sandusky’s arrest. Prosecutors could have evidence that contradicts the findings of the Freeh report, for example, or they simply could be taking their time to strengthen a potential case against Mr. Spanier, Mr. DerOhannesian said.
“There is nothing particularly unusual in no charges yet filed,” he said via email. “After all, how many years did it take any prosecutor to charge Jerry Sandusky?”
Mr. Curley and Mr. Schultz were charged in November with failing to report suspected child abuse, as required by law, and perjuring themselves before the grand jury investigating Sandusky. They have pleaded not guilty.
Their attorneys argued Thursday for dismissal and made other pretrial motions. The judge made no immediate rulings. The defendants themselves were not in court.
Mr. Spanier, meanwhile, has kept a low profile since the early days of the scandal that cost Paterno his job, tarnished Penn State’s reputation and led to unprecedented NCAA sanctions against the football program. He has issued a handful of written statements since the July 12 release of the Freeh report but otherwise largely has disappeared from public view.
What is known is that Mr. Spanier performed top-secret national security consulting work for the federal government. His security clearance underwent a four-month review after Sandusky’s arrest in November and was reaffirmed — proof, suggested Mr. Spanier, that he has done nothing wrong.View Entire Story
By Andrew P. Napolitano
The president's men trash the Constitution to pursue antagonists
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.
News and opinion from a Millennial Urbanite with Southern sensibilities,
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention