- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Activists file challenge to get corporate political donations ban on D.C. ballot
Question of the Day
A group of activists hoping to ban direct corporate contributions to D.C. political campaigns is challenging an Aug. 8 ruling by the city’s Board of Elections in a last-ditch effort to put their initiative on the November ballot.
Members of the D.C. Public Trust said a pair of “line-by-line reviews of the board’s work” show they gathered signatures from more than 24,500 registered voters — more than enough to put their issue before the voters. The board ruled petitioners had not gathered enough signatures.
“Our review finds that Initiative 70 clearly qualified for the ballot, and we expect the court will agree,” said organizer Bryan Weaver, a Ward 1 resident.
The group’s army of volunteers collected and submitted more than 30,000 signatures from across the city, but the elections board said just 21,572 — or 1,726 short of the minimum threshold — were valid.
The activists had 10 days to consider an appeal. They say their findings will turn the tide in their favor.
Among their claims, the group’s court filing says the board invalidated signatures because the registered voter used a nickname instead of his or her full name. It also tossed signatures that had been collected at polling sites “moments after the individual had voted,” court papers say.
In cases in which a person’s name showed up twice on petition pages, they say the board invalided both signatures instead of counting one.
Using the election board’s guidelines, the group said it “counted 24,645 duly registered voters identified by the Board — 1,346 more than the 23,299 [5 percent] required by law … In addition, the review conducted by D.C. Public Trust identified more than 1,000 duly registered voters on petition sheets who had been improperly disqualified.”
Technically, the group had until mid-September to gather more signatures under the 180-day circulation period. The extra time would allow them to qualify for a future special election if D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson wins the November election for chairman and permanently vacates the at-large seat he left when former council Chairman Kwame R. Brown resigned amid felony charges in June.
But regulations from the election board suggest the group will have to start from scratch. The relevant clause says: “Signatures submitted in support of a rejected initiative or referendum petition shall not be resubmitted for filing in order to qualify the measure for an election ballot.”
The situation coincides with D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray’s plans to roll out more nuanced legislation intended to curb pay-to-play politics in the city. Among its reforms, the legislation would require corporations that contribute to a candidate to identify all of their subsidiaries, affiliates and controlling shareholders.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- White House hits back at Republicans and tallies up Obamacare benefits
- Fake sign language interpreter from Mandela memorial admitted to psych ward
- Florida Dem senator defends NSA snooping efforts
- Calls for military pension fix grow
- La. Gov. Jindal defends suspended Duck Dynasty star
Latest Blog Entries
- D.C. to tout Obamacare among youth waiting for Air Jordans
- Sen. John Thune: Congress will restore military-retiree cuts when it gets back from holidays
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Uninsured Americans just as skeptical of Obamacare as those who have coverage
- Sen. Saxby Chambliss: Americans just aren't keen on Obamacare
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Democrats cite pope in call for minimum wage hike, jobless benefits
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Crystal Wright is a black conservative woman living in Washington, D.C.
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow