- Oregonians flee in face of fast-moving wildfire as homes go up in blaze
- Eric Holder: ‘Racial animus’ fuels opposition to Obama and me
- Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl to return to active duty at Fort Sam Houston
- Israel says it’s downed drone along southern coast
- Despite offensive, Gaza rockets still hit Israel
- Extra-time goal gives Germany World Cup title over Argentina
- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: ‘Tolerance’ double standard
Question of the Day
Liberals contend that they are the tolerant ones, but it seems that tolerance to them means that you must agree with their point of view -- otherwise, watch out. The following are just a few examples.
When the owner of Chick-fil-A exercised his First Amendment right to be open about his opposition to homosexual marriage, three liberal mayors -- from Chicago, Boston and Washington -- retaliated by saying that they didn't want Chick-fil-A's business in their city. Naturally, this drew no condemnation from "tolerant" liberals.
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and her family were excoriated and called all sorts of vile names by liberals when Mrs. Palin was on the GOP presidential ticket four years ago. Again, not a word from "tolerant" liberals. But when law student Sandra Fluke, that spokeswoman for free contraception, was called a bad name by a conservative talk show host, liberals demanded sponsors stop backing the host. President Obama even personally called Ms. Fluke. (He never called Mrs. Palin.) Is this what they call "tolerance"?
Mitt Romney is falsely accused of being responsible for the death of a woman who had cancer. The response from the "tolerant" contingent: nothing but defense of the advertisement supporting this sewage. Similarly, when the Tea Party was expressing its constitutional right to demonstrate, liberals, some in Congress, labeled them Nazis, terrorists, racists and other vile names. But when the anti-Wall Street crowd demonstrated -- including littering, defecating on police cars and causing much damage, costing taxpayers millions -- "tolerant" liberals praised and supported them because they had a right to "demonstrate." Apparently, the same rule didn't apply to a peaceful, clean Tea Party demonstration.
All points of view, without use of personal smear attacks, should be respected, whether we agree with them or not. Our country deserves better from those who contend to be tolerant, but by their ideological actions demonstrate only opposition and hate.
Mount Vernon, Va.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Robert N. Tracci
Congress must use its appropriations power to secure the border
Get Breaking Alerts
- DOJ investigates Nebraska parade float critical of Obama
- Agency scrubs Malia Obama photos at White House's request: report
- A 'new Cold War': China's top paper warns of 'slippery slope' towards conflict with U.S.
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Emeryville, Calif., police chief: Guns aren't for defense
- Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi formerly a U.S. captive
- KUHNER: Will Russia-Ukraine be Europe's next war?
- Germany wins World Cup title on Mario Goetze goal in extra time
- Obama's 'blank check' rejected as border solution
- New York City creates ID card so 500K illegal immigrants can get services
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: How many boondoggles to break the bank?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The problem is unenforced borders
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Where are condolences for Jewish teens' deaths?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama welcomes illegals, ignores Americans
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama has no intention of repatriating illegals