TAUBE: Mitt Romney needs the independent vote

On track to succeed where McCain failed

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

This week’s GOP convention in Tampa is an exciting occasion for party loyalists. Plenty of pomp and circumstance, interesting policy discussions and debates, and high-profile speakers are being showcased to a national audience.

Beyond the bright lights and shining faces, the convention also serves as a strategic battleground for Republicans. While certain demographic groups are relatively secure in the party’s camp (i.e. fiscal and social conservatives, right-leaning libertarians, Tea Party supporters) others remain in play. In particular, there’s one group that GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney needs if he’s going to win in November: independent voters.

According to most academic reports and studies, roughly 25 percent to 30 percent of Americans self-identify as independents. They typically reject political ideology and don’t vote along party lines. Rather, they support individual candidates for office and/or appealing policy platforms from major or minor political parties. As this is a mass entity of collective thoughts rather than a pure voting block, the technique for Democrats and Republicans to win over independent voters changes every election cycle.

In the 2008 presidential election, Barack Obama successfully won over independent voters. The final Gallup poll (Oct. 31-Nov. 2) had Mr. Obama leading John McCain 48 percent to 43 percent, and exit-poll data had him ahead 52 percent to 44 percent. Hence, the “outsider” Democratic candidate’s message of hope and change trumped the GOP’s political maverick.

Can Mr. Romney succeed where Mr. McCain failed? Yes, because the political dynamic is significantly different from what it was four years ago.

For one thing, Mr. Obama isn’t a political outsider any longer. The minute he stepped into the White House, everything changed. Mr. Obama learned more about the Washington political machine, dealt with foreign-policy matters, met with world leaders and dignitaries, and so forth. The president is still free to follow Franklin D. Roosevelt’s lead and continue calling himself a man of the people. But the fact is that he’s an integral part of the political process — or, to put it another way — a political insider.

Additionally, the president who constantly promotes a state of, in Sarah Palin’s words, “hopey changey” really has a leadership style that’s wishy-washy. High taxes, huge spending measures, government bailouts, the promotion of discourse with tyrannical regimes and despots, and weak Middle East policies are just a few things that have been brought to you by the Obama White House. The prospect of another four years of further economic decline has many Americans, shall we say, hoping for change.

The independent vote is ripe for the picking. If Mr. Romney plays his cards correctly, he will be able to capture a large chunk of those voters and increase his chances of victory. The GOP convention is therefore the real starting point in regaining the lost support of independents.

How can this be accomplished? For one thing, Mr. Romney needs to play up his business credentials to the hilt. While his tenure at Bain Capital hasn’t always been a public-relations winner, many independents still respect political candidates who work hard and succeed in the private sector. Hence, Mr. Romney’s support for reduced personal and corporate taxes, trade liberalization and firm opposition to government bailouts will enhance his stature as a fiscally conservative president-in-waiting. The more discussion about limited government and free-market thinking in his speech, the better.

Mr. Romney’s firm support for Israel and opposition to terrorism also will appeal to many independents who think Mr. Obama has been weak in those areas. While it’s true some independents are opposed to a stronger military and a tougher line on international matters, most respect patriotic leaders who are willing to defend domestic and global safety and security. A strong leader who supports liberty, democracy and freedom at all costs will make independents notice.

Meanwhile, Mr. Romney’s running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan, also has some strong advantages among independents. His youth and energetic approach to politics work heavily in his favor (as it did for Mr. Obama in 2008) and his fierce interest in economics is a winning position. (Independents love numbers, so this is a perfect fit.) Mr. Ryan has been an excellent choice as vice-presidential candidate, and his broad-based appeal will intrigue many different demographic groups.

The independent vote likely is going to make or break the Romney-Ryan ticket. It’s crucial that both men make strong pitches in Tampa to bring this voting bloc back under the Republican tent. By doing so, they will give Mr. Obama and his senior advisers something else to worry about on the lonely, winding roads of the campaign trail.

Michael Taube is a columnist and former speechwriter for Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts