- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
CURL: The silly season — Obama’s winning?!
Question of the Day
“Obama Expands National Lead Over Romney To 10 Points In Pew Poll,” said one headline last week.
But wait. “Economic Forecasting Model Predicts Obama Will Lose In Near-Landslide,” said another.
Or take these two headlines on Friday, shortly after the unemployment rate rose to 8.3 percent: “AP: Stronger job creation could help Obama’s re-election hopes”; and “Reuters: Labor market slowed sharply after strong gains in winter, spelling trouble for Obama.”
We are, of course, in the “silly season.” This time, Congress has gone home, the Republican presidential candidate is off on an international trip, and the president is on the golf course.
And in this season, everyone says whatever they want — it doesn’t matter, no one will know if it’s true or not, and whatever is said will be ancient history by tomorrow morning.
Still, it’s worth taking a look at what’s bouncing around out there. First, that poll. The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press (that’s their name, really) released a survey showing President Obama holding a “sizable lead” — 10 points — over Mitt Romney.
But there was something interesting about the poll sampling method: Pew’s survey included 459 Republicans, 813 Democrats and 599 independents. That’s a 19 percent edge for Democrats, even though polls on voter identification give Republicans a small lead. Oddly, two polls about the same time were completely different: Rasmussen had Mr. Romney up by 2 percentage points, and Gallup had the Republican down by just 2 points.
Almost unnoticed was another poll by Gallup. The survey found Mr. Obama has an approval rating above 50 percent in just 13 states and was below 50 percent in 36 states. Why does that matter?
“The 50% approval mark is significant because post-World War II incumbent presidents who have been above 50% job approval on Election Day were easily re-elected,” Gallup wrote. “Presidents with approval ratings below 50% have more uncertain re-election prospects. Historically, two presidents below 50% in their final approval rating before the election — George W. Bush and Harry Truman — won, and three, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, and George H.W. Bush, lost.”
Which brings up that other headline: “Economic Forecasting Model Predicts Obama Will Lose In Near-Landslide.”
After complex calculations that included “the protocol of the PS Election Forecast Symposium” and “Obama’s Expected Two-Party Vote Share At Hypothetical Real-Income Growth Rates 2012:Q3-2012:Q4,” the author, James Pethokoukis of American Enterprise Institute — citing research by political scientist Douglas. A. Hibbs — concludes “Romney wins 52.5% to Obama’s 47.5%.”
Worse, the “right track/wrong track” number skews hard against re-election. The RealClearPolitics average shows 32.7 percent say right track, 60.7 percent say wrong track. Gallup notes that an incumbent party generally needs to be above 35 percent on right track to win.
Still, the mainstream media, especially the networks, are doing all they can to re-elect their favorite son — like the Associated Press’ headline about good news in a jobs report that showed the unemployment rate rising. The watchdog group Media Research Center found that during Mr. Romney’s trip to London, Israel and Poland, 18 network stories, or 86 percent emphasized the candidate’s diplomatic blunders.
About the Author
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- GOP Rep. Tim Murphy rolls out mental health legislation
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Does it take over 25 years in public service to really know what goes on in Washington?
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow