- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
MILLER: Mommy Bloomberg
Nanny-state policies in New York City go too far
Question of the Day
Michael R. Bloomberg thinks he knows better what to feed a newborn baby than the baby’s mother. The New York City mayor, who is on a tear to dictate everything New Yorkers put in their mouths, is now playing doctor with diets for newborns. This is an unwelcome intrusion of the nanny state into the nursery.
Starting next month, New York City hospitals in the mayor’s Latch on NYC program will stop supplementing breast-feeding infants with formula unless it’s medically necessary, as documented on a baby’s medical chart. Hospital staff will have limited access to formula, and free formula or promotional materials will be banned from hospitals. The state already requires that any mother who asks for formula be given a lecture by hospital staff on the benefits of nursing. The theory is that breast milk is healthier because babies on it have a lower risk of infection and asthma.
The city acknowledges that 90 percent of mothers breast-feed their children after birth, so the campaign is intended to force the 70 percent who stop after two months to keep going until a half-year. What’s ignored is that some tots feed better on bottles, and two months is about the time when women return to work after maternity leave, making it harder to feed au naturale.
Women’s groups aren’t backing up this plan. “New moms should be the ones to decide what is best for their babies, not Mayor Bloomberg,” said Alice Stewart, spokeswoman for Concerned Women for America. “With an unemployment rate in New York City above 10 percent, the mayor should stop imposing his position on breast-feeding and fast-food drinks, and focus on creating jobs.”
Ms. Stewart is referring to the sugary beverages of more than 16 ounces that Mr. Bloomberg wants to outlaw from restaurants, movie theaters, sports arenas and even mobile food carts. Hizzoner announced the initiative in May, claiming sweet beverages are “a leading cause” of obesity. Clearly, it’s easier for a politician to scapegoat job-creating companies such as Coca-Cola Co. or PepsiCo than to blame Joe Six-pack for eating too much and not exercising enough.
The mama mayor’s apron strings are long and all tangled up. Six years ago, he banned trans fats from being used by restaurants in the hopes of lowering the cholesterol of those who dine out regularly. That same year, he forced chain restaurants to post the calories of the food on their menus. Because 60 percent of New Yorkers are still overweight, all the regulation doesn’t seem to be working. In 2008, Mr. Bloomberg targeted salt for raising blood pressure and created a “voluntary” program for restaurants and packaged-food makers to reduce sodium content by 25 percent. None of those mandates has achieved its purpose.
Liberals like Mr. Bloomberg think they know what we all should or shouldn’t put in our bodies. These ineffective policies are offensive to individual rights. In the fight over formula, Big Brother is treating parents like ignorant children. As long as a mother isn’t being abusive or neglectful, it is beyond the pale for the government to tell her how and what to feed her baby.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Republicans vote for budget with higher spending, defy Tea Party and conservative principles
- MILLER: Allen West’s exercise routine of running and calisthenics
- MILLER: Newtown anniversary used by Obama and Bloomberg for politics
- MILLER: Dick Heller challenges D.C.’s gun registration, files for summary judgment in Heller II
- MILLER: Brady Campaign says Colorado recalls due to NRA, not grassroots opposition to gun control
Latest Blog Entries
By Michael P. Orsi
Edward Snowden should declare his patriotism in court
Get Breaking Alerts
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Special ops vets slam military benefit cuts
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House