- The Washington Times - Thursday, December 13, 2012


Everything you ever wanted to know about the Obama economy is in a single sentence about the Federal Reserve Board’s latest attempts this week to deal with unacceptably high unemployment.

Fed officials projected that the jobless rate, now at 7.7 percent, would not reach 6.5 percent until near the end of 2015 at the earliest,” The Washington Post reported in its lead front-page story on Thursday.

If there’s anyone out there — besides President Obama’s top advisers and diehard allies in Congress — who thinks his economic policies, or lack thereof, will restore a weak economy to its full vigor in his second term, they’ve got a long wait.

Year after year over the course of Mr. Obama’s impotent fiscal policies, the Fed has thrown everything it had at the economy, pumping trillions of dollars in printed money into U.S. Treasury bond purchases while reducing its interest rates to near zero — without much to show for it.

With the “fiscal cliff” now looming more menacingly than ever before, and the economic and jobs data weakening month by month, the Fed is doubling down on monetary measures to breath some life back into the economy in the absence of any serious fiscal plan by the administration.

Yet, with each long-term prognosis report, the Fed’s target dates for a hoped-for recovery recede deeper into the future.

Fed officials are telling us now that they do not expect to see a light at the end of this long, jobless tunnel until nearly the end of Mr. Obama’s second term. Possibly, it won’t happen until a new president takes his place.

Let’s face it, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has very few monetary weapons left to turn this economy around and he’s said many times that the only real solution lies in fundamentally changing fiscal policy.

That means reducing the massive amounts of capital that the government sucks out of the economy each year and enacting economic growth incentives on the tax side of the equation.

However, Mr. Obama opposes any serious policy changes in that direction. Indeed, he wants to do just the opposite: extract trillions more from a weak economy through higher taxes so he can spend more on waste-ridden programs like his multibillion-dollar clean energy investments. Recently, a battery manufacturer was added to his bankruptcy list failures, this one costing taxpayers $133 million.

Even though Mr. Bernanke’s plaintive pleas for changes in fiscal policies have fallen on deaf ears at the White House, he tried again at a news conference Wednesday when he announced the Fed’s stepped-up goals for the economy.

“If the economy actually went off the fiscal cliff … that would have very significant adverse effects on the economy and on the unemployment rate,” he said. “We would try to do what we could … but I just want to again be clear that we cannot offset the full impact of the fiscal cliff. It’s just too big.”

“The most helpful thing that Congress and [the] administration can do at this point … is to find a solution and avoid derailing the recovery,” he said.

It should be clear that nothing the Fed said it would do is going to change the profound economic challenges we face now or ever. The financial markets’ reaction to the Fed’s actions was a great yawn and stock markets ended the day essentially flat.

Meantime, Mr. Obama continues to live in his own dream world, a hermetically sealed universe in which he insists the economy is doing fine. Speaking to a crowd of several hundred United Auto Workers union members in Detroit on Monday, he said, “We’re moving in the right direction. We’re going forward. So what we need to do is simple — we need to keep going forward.”

This comes from a president who said earlier this year that “the private sector is doing just fine.”

At best, the economy is barely moving. It’s creeping along at an average annual growth rate of 1.7 percent — well below the growth rate needed to bring unemployment down to normal levels.

Worse, the economy as a whole is not going forward — it’s in reverse. Economists say its growth rate has slowed in this quarter to no more than 1.5 percent, perilously close to the tipping point of another recession.

Mr. Obama also told those union workers that “American manufacturing is growing at the fastest pace since the 1990s,” and that factories have created nearly 500,000 jobs since 2010. The painful reality is that manufacturing still has 2 million fewer jobs than existed before the recession. Last month’s jobs report showed the number of manufacturing and construction jobs remained unchanged.

Economists on both sides of the political aisle say this is the weakest recovery since the Great Depression, and the unspoken reality is that Mr. Obama has not offered any new comprehensive plan to get the economy moving since his failed $831 billion spending stimulus program in 2009.

He has proposed tinier versions of the same plan, but they have been rejected by Congress and there has been no substantive White House proposal since then. The economy is limping on automatic pilot as it cruises along the edge of the dreaded fiscal cliff, while the president lives in a fantasy world in which our factories are “humming again,” as his campaign’s TV ads said, jobs are being created at an imagined pace, and a fictionalized economy is improving.

There is a growing mountain of evidence that things are not OK. Pessimism is growing, businesses large and small are pulling back and consumers are spending less than expected.

The National Federation of Independent Business index of small-business optimism has sunk to one of its lowest levels in a quarter-century. The percentage of NFIB’s small-business owners who think the Obama economy will improve fell by 37 points.

The University of Michigan’s closely-watched consumer confidence preliminary index for December fell sharply to 74.5 from 82.7. National retail sales were up by only 0.3 percent last month, half of what forecasters predicted.

All the while, the president is still peddling higher taxes as the only cure for what ails us — the economic equivalent of the 18th century practice of bleeding a patient to restore his health. We know how that turned out.

Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and former chief political correspondent for The Washington Times.

Copyright © 2017 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus


Click to Read More

Click to Hide