- Kraft recalls 96K pounds of Oscar Mayer hot dogs over cheese error
- Boy Scouts boots church as host after gay leadership dispute
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s new book raises 2016 presidential speculation
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Rep. Marsha Blackburn: Hillary Clinton won’t be first female president
- French president accuses Syria’s Assad of gassing his own citizens
- Jimmy Carter’s grandson makes gains in governor’s race in Georgia
- Yemen: Airstrike targets al Qaeda training camps
- Easter worshippers shocked as car rams church, injuring 21
- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: ‘Automatic’ weapon still requires human intent
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, has stated that her intent is to introduce a bill on the first day of the next Congress to “ban assault weapons” (“Feinstein’s assault weapons ban would abolish the 2nd Amendment,” Web, Tuesday). That’s a catchy phrase with a lot of apparent emotional bite to it, just like the liberals’ “war on women” and “bigotry” of Tea Partyers.
In the most recent case, the true victims were the youngsters and staff of a Connecticut elementary school, murdered by a deranged person who wasn’t much older than the child victims. His punishment was the torment with which he lived and died.
In reaction to this event and the long-standing intent to pierce the armor of the Second Amendment, the follow-up “opportunity” seems to be a ban on “assault weapons.” The proposed legislation would limit weapon magazines to 10 rounds each. To solve this setback, that would mean a killer would have to change to a second magazine, taking two seconds, to be able to kill 20 people. Add another two seconds if the goal is to kill 30 people.
Those of us who served in combat know that assault is not a weapon, but rather a state of mind. Assault weapons can be semi-automatic or fully automatic, fire a single shot or even a burst of fire, but none is automatic. All gun categories are subject to the mindset of the person who possesses the weapon. On its own, no weapon is guilty of assault. The same can be said about a butcher’s knife, an automobile, a rock and a bowling ball, among other items.
Statistics will bear out that owners of most types of guns are responsible. Ironically, accused Fort Hood shooter Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan did not use what we commonly refer to as an assault weapon, but rather handguns, to kill numerous innocent individuals. Are pistols assault weapons, too?
If we want to understand how people become murderers, we should give more thought to the problem of people in an open and free society who have been told they are not responsible for their own actions.
Sherman Oaks, Calif.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- CURL: Shelly O first lady Michelle Obama comes in last
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Building a D.C. memorial for an endless war bumps into regulations
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- No rush: Bob Goodlatte waits for heads to cool on heated legislation