Republican senators said Friday that the State Department’s investigative report on the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, does not address questions about the role of Cabinet officials in responding to the assault that night and mischaracterizing it afterwards.
“There are many more relevant questions surrounding this tragedy that still need to be answered,” Sen. John McCain of Arizona said at a Capitol Hill press conference.
“We know nothing, really, quite frankly, about [the role of] President Obama – before, during and after the attack,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.
The report, which was released late Tuesday, says that “senior-level inter-agency discussions continued through the night” of Sept. 11 as the attack unfolded in two short waves, several hours apart and at separate, nearby locations. But it gives no details about who took part.
“What did he do for the seven hours in question?” Mr. Graham said, referring to the president.
Mrs. Ayotte said the report noted serious concerns about the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi and eastern Libya, which was a hotbed of al Qaeda sympathizers. The board also said that Sate Department personnel in Libya had asked for more security several times but Washington officials rejected those requests.
“If that did go up to the chain of command, why weren’t actions taken?” said Mrs. Ayotte.
In testimony before House lawmakers Thursday, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns said that, while Secretary of State Hilary Rodham Clinton and other senior officials had been briefed about the security situation in Libya, decisions about security were made at the assistant secretary level.
Four State Department officials were relieved of their duties this week over the report, and the three who were identified held posts at the assistant secretary or deputy assistant secretary level.
Mr. McCain, the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, asked why military units were not ready to respond.
“After repeated attacks on U.S. and Western interests in Benghazi,” the assault by heavily armed extremists “should have been a foreseeable contingency,” he said, adding that the Pentagon should “conduct a similar independent and comprehensive accountability” investigation.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Shaun Waterman is an award-winning reporter for The Washington Times, covering foreign affairs, defense and cybersecurity. He was a senior editor and correspondent for United Press International for nearly a decade, and has covered the Department of Homeland Security since 2003. His reporting on the Sept. 11 Commission and the tortuous process by which some of its recommendations finally became ...
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
What does the middle-class conservative think about everything? Find out here.
A carefully guided tour through the confusing world of modern bookselling and publishing.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Weekly agitation from a columnist who many believed to be one of the least likely to become known as a Conservative Republican.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention