- South Korean president: Ferry crew actions ‘murderous’
- President Obama poised to grant clemency to nonviolent drug offenders: report
- Teen OK after riding in wheel well of Hawaii jet
- Kraft recalls 96K pounds of Oscar Mayer hot dogs over cheese error
- Boy Scouts boots church as host after gay leadership dispute
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s new book raises 2016 presidential speculation
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Rep. Marsha Blackburn: Hillary Clinton won’t be first female president
- French president accuses Syria’s Assad of gassing his own citizens
- Jimmy Carter’s grandson makes gains in governor’s race in Georgia
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Boosting exports could help solve “cliff” crisis
Does it make sense to measure apple exports by counting oranges? Of course not. But this is how the United States measures and reports its progress in trade policy. That’s because we compute and report the value of our trade in dollars, when the most important measurement should be volume — the amount of product we sell to others.
This year, trade has leveled off. It’s going to be difficult for President Obama to make good on his pledge to double U.S. exports by 2015. To complicate matters, we’re measuring in dollars instead of volume. While U.S. export dollar values have gone up, currency valuations mask the true story. This is where the data are more troubling.
Farm exports have been a bright spot. The Department of Agriculture predicted that this year’s farm exports will be $9 billion more than last year’s. However, the total volume of farm exports will be about 119 million tons this year, well below recent levels.
One of the best ways to improve export volume is through policy — rules at home that allow farmers and businesses to thrive, and trade agreements that allow goods and services to move freely.
A central dispute between the White House and Congress in the “fiscal cliff” standoff involves spending. Properly understood, exports can act as a stimulus without adding debt. More trade would create jobs and economic growth at no cost to the public treasury, especially if we strive to increase our sales volume, not just the sales value.
Rockwell City, Iowa
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- CURL: Shelly O first lady Michelle Obama comes in last
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Building a D.C. memorial for an endless war bumps into regulations
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- No rush: Bob Goodlatte waits for heads to cool on heated legislation