- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Boosting exports could help solve “cliff” crisis
Does it make sense to measure apple exports by counting oranges? Of course not. But this is how the United States measures and reports its progress in trade policy. That’s because we compute and report the value of our trade in dollars, when the most important measurement should be volume — the amount of product we sell to others.
This year, trade has leveled off. It’s going to be difficult for President Obama to make good on his pledge to double U.S. exports by 2015. To complicate matters, we’re measuring in dollars instead of volume. While U.S. export dollar values have gone up, currency valuations mask the true story. This is where the data are more troubling.
Farm exports have been a bright spot. The Department of Agriculture predicted that this year’s farm exports will be $9 billion more than last year’s. However, the total volume of farm exports will be about 119 million tons this year, well below recent levels.
One of the best ways to improve export volume is through policy — rules at home that allow farmers and businesses to thrive, and trade agreements that allow goods and services to move freely.
A central dispute between the White House and Congress in the “fiscal cliff” standoff involves spending. Properly understood, exports can act as a stimulus without adding debt. More trade would create jobs and economic growth at no cost to the public treasury, especially if we strive to increase our sales volume, not just the sales value.
Rockwell City, Iowa
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Vietnam says it may have found door of missing Malaysian jet as intel look into stolen passports
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- High schooler suing parents for money shot down by judge
- Italy outraged over U.S. gun dealer's 'David' ad
- Why Malaysia Airlines jet might have disappeared?
- CPAC 2014 straw poll results
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults