- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: On defense, U.S. must learn from Israel
Rebeccah Heinrichs says we should take ballistic missile defense seriously (“It’s time to get serious about missile defense,” Dec. 20). Fortunately, some of us have taken the subject seriously since President Reagan introduced the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) in March 1983, almost 30 years ago. It has been an uphill battle for those of us who recognized the potential of missile defense to provide an alternative to an instant and overwhelming response to an unprovoked attack.
For years, critics insisted that the concept of hitting a bullet with a bullet was impossible. Even after American technology developed and proved the hit-to-kill capability, others suggested that the enemy easily could deploy decoys with warheads, thereby outwitting a defense. In truth, the development and deployment of decoys that appear to the defense to mirror warheads is far more complex than critics thought. Like other criticisms, it was a further attempt to dissuade our government from deploying an effective ballistic missile defense (BMD).
Fortunately, the recent attack on Israel from Gaza proved the effectiveness and the value of a defense. We have yet to see how well this lesson has been learned by the Obama administration, although the defense budget passed by the House, which includes funding for the study of a third BMD launch site on the East Coast, suggests that some have grasped the potential.
We hope the irony of Israel proving to the world that BMD can be effective will not be lost on our leaders. The concept of BMD was introduced in the United States, and since then, this country has spent more than $160 billion developing systems. Our efforts have not been sufficiently focused, so despite that expenditure, our defenses remain inferior to those of Israel. Its successive governments recognized the threat they faced and tailored investment to meet their needs. Will we now learn from Israel and follow their example?
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Two liberals say Sarah Palin is right: Obama lacks substance
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults