- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: On defense, U.S. must learn from Israel
Rebeccah Heinrichs says we should take ballistic missile defense seriously (“It’s time to get serious about missile defense,” Dec. 20). Fortunately, some of us have taken the subject seriously since President Reagan introduced the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) in March 1983, almost 30 years ago. It has been an uphill battle for those of us who recognized the potential of missile defense to provide an alternative to an instant and overwhelming response to an unprovoked attack.
For years, critics insisted that the concept of hitting a bullet with a bullet was impossible. Even after American technology developed and proved the hit-to-kill capability, others suggested that the enemy easily could deploy decoys with warheads, thereby outwitting a defense. In truth, the development and deployment of decoys that appear to the defense to mirror warheads is far more complex than critics thought. Like other criticisms, it was a further attempt to dissuade our government from deploying an effective ballistic missile defense (BMD).
Fortunately, the recent attack on Israel from Gaza proved the effectiveness and the value of a defense. We have yet to see how well this lesson has been learned by the Obama administration, although the defense budget passed by the House, which includes funding for the study of a third BMD launch site on the East Coast, suggests that some have grasped the potential.
We hope the irony of Israel proving to the world that BMD can be effective will not be lost on our leaders. The concept of BMD was introduced in the United States, and since then, this country has spent more than $160 billion developing systems. Our efforts have not been sufficiently focused, so despite that expenditure, our defenses remain inferior to those of Israel. Its successive governments recognized the threat they faced and tailored investment to meet their needs. Will we now learn from Israel and follow their example?
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- 'Deport Bieber' petition draws no comment from White House